Bullfrog said:
Manson said:
Please research the case before you comment. The DNA evidence not only proves she didn't do it, but proves it is impossible for her to have done it. Literally impossible.
While I do believe she's innocent, your statement above isn't correct. Lack of her DNA is simply that, a lack of evidence that she did do it. Lack of evidence doesn't make it impossible nor does it prove she didn't do it. What it does is doesn't prove that she did.
Actually, according to the evidence all the signs point to Rudy Guede. At the very least a scenario with her involvement is extremely unlikely.
I mean, they placed the guy's footprint in the house. He stated he broke into the house when Meredith was there. He confessed he did it to a friend (not under duress) but retracted his statement when he was on the record. He fled the country after she was killed, he often carried a knife. I mean, so many things here are, at least, strong indicators before we even put in forensic evidence.
Guede "became a suspect in the murder two weeks after Miss Kercher's body was found, when DNA tests on a bloody fingerprint and on samples taken from the body were found to match samples which police already had on file following his earlier arrests."
"DNA matching Guede's was found both on and inside Kercher's body[28][60] and on her shirt, bra and handbag.[61] A bloody handprint found on a pillow under Kercher's back was also matched to Guede"
"The court found that Guede's version of events did not match some of the forensic evidence, remarking that he could not explain why one of his palm prints, stained with Kercher's blood, had been found on the pillow of the single bed, under the disrobed body,[28][120] when he had stated that he had left her fully dressed.[5]:175"
"one of Guede's former cellmates testified that Guede revealed that Knox and Sollecito had nothing to do with the crime.[154] He testified that Guede and another friend went to Kercher's house with the intent of having three way sex with her, but when she refused his friend stabbed her to death.[154] The defence also called other witnesses to support Alessi's testimony. One such witness testified that he had heard stories of Knox and Sollecito's innocence while he was in jail and he heard Guede say that Knox and Sollecito were innocent.[154][155] However, Guede denied this on the stand, calling it "all lies". He said he had never discussed the murder and that the former cellmate was being manipulated by others."
This guy had a huge history of lying and going back and forth but there's some pretty hard hitting evidence here that places him at the crime, high chance of him committing the crime, fleeing from the crime, stealing things from the scene of the crime, being extradited by German police, being unreliable in stating that Sollecito and Knox acted with him, a long track record of offences. The three never knew each other and also never placed phone calls with each other.
There's no reason to even prosecute the two of them based on such overwhelming evidence. Like I said before: Entrapment and duress, just like in Milgaard and Truscott. If you maintain your innocence, they threaten to throw the book at you harder for being difficult.
