bustaheims
Active member
Not confirmed, would need to waive NTC.
DarrenDreger: Gaborik to CBJ pending he waives and trade call.
DarrenDreger: Gaborik to CBJ pending he waives and trade call.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullfrog said:Sather doesn't mess around.
Not sure why this made me laugh, but Gaborik currently has 333 goals and 333 assists in his NHL career.
TheMightyOdin said:Bullfrog said:Sather doesn't mess around.
Not sure why this made me laugh, but Gaborik currently has 333 goals and 333 assists in his NHL career.
Sounds like he should have gone to the devils.
Gilmour the Great said:So basically, it ended up being
Nash
Brassard
Dorsett
John Moore
6th
for
Gaborik
Dubinsky
Anisimov
Tim Erixon
1st
The Rangers got HOSED.
Snoop Lion said:Gilmour the Great said:So basically, it ended up being
Nash
Brassard
Dorsett
John Moore
6th
for
Gaborik
Dubinsky
Anisimov
Tim Erixon
1st
The Rangers got HOSED.
Nash is by far the best asset out of both groups though, so while NY may not have come out ahead, it's not that lopsided.
Gilmour the Great said:I think Gaborik is very close in value to Nash. Last season, a straight-up Nash for Gaborik trade would not have been out of the question. When you factor in all the other assets that CBJ acquired versus the filler NYR got, it certainly seems like a drubbing to me. Gaborik is a 40 goal threat every year.
Gilmour the Great said:Snoop Lion said:Gilmour the Great said:So basically, it ended up being
Nash
Brassard
Dorsett
John Moore
6th
for
Gaborik
Dubinsky
Anisimov
Tim Erixon
1st
The Rangers got HOSED.
Nash is by far the best asset out of both groups though, so while NY may not have come out ahead, it's not that lopsided.
I think Gaborik is very close in value to Nash. Last season, a straight-up Nash for Gaborik trade would not have been out of the question. When you factor in all the other assets that CBJ acquired versus the filler NYR got, it certainly seems like a drubbing to me. Gaborik is a 40 goal threat every year.
bustaheims said:Gilmour the Great said:I think Gaborik is very close in value to Nash. Last season, a straight-up Nash for Gaborik trade would not have been out of the question. When you factor in all the other assets that CBJ acquired versus the filler NYR got, it certainly seems like a drubbing to me. Gaborik is a 40 goal threat every year.
Even on that level, it's not that bad. Moore and Erixon are about equal, as are Brassard and Anisimov. Dubinsky isn't the player he was a couple seasons ago, and is fairly injury prone - he and Dorsett aren't significantly different in value right now either, all things considered. Yeah, the Rags gave up more if you combine these deals, but, they also got the best player, so, all in all, it's pretty balanced.
Kessel Run said:Why do the Rangers trade picks for Clowe, but then give up Gaborik for futures?
How bad exactly was Gaborik this year?
Kessel Run said:Why do the Rangers trade picks for Clowe, but then give up Gaborik for futures?
Kessel Run said:Why do the Rangers trade picks for Clowe, but then give up Gaborik for futures?
How bad exactly was Gaborik this year?