Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sickbeast said:https://www.msn.com/en-ca/sports/nhl/maple-leafs-place-petan-marincin-on-waivers/ar-BBWqkIX?li=AAggNb9
Losing Petan in particular for sweet nothing seems like a real shame to me.
He got claimed? Petan is a numbers game. He's a depth guy that Babs has no use for. Didnt pay anything for him so if they lose him, they gain a contractprincedpw said:sickbeast said:https://www.msn.com/en-ca/sports/nhl/maple-leafs-place-petan-marincin-on-waivers/ar-BBWqkIX?li=AAggNb9
Losing Petan in particular for sweet nothing seems like a real shame to me.
Well, it seems he just isn?t good enough to make the team. Losing our 14th forward, or whatever, just doesn?t seem like it really matters.
Guilt Trip said:He got claimed? Petan is a numbers game. He's a depth guy that Babs has no use for. Didnt pay anything for him so if they lose him, they gain a contractprincedpw said:sickbeast said:https://www.msn.com/en-ca/sports/nhl/maple-leafs-place-petan-marincin-on-waivers/ar-BBWqkIX?li=AAggNb9
Losing Petan in particular for sweet nothing seems like a real shame to me.
Well, it seems he just isn?t good enough to make the team. Losing our 14th forward, or whatever, just doesn?t seem like it really matters.
The logic of that escapes me. Why would a team now be willing to give something up in trade when they could have had the player without giving up any assets for him at all?CarltonTheBear said:...The fact that they've cleared waivers might make them more appealing to another team.
Hobbes said:The logic of that escapes me. Why would a team now be willing to give something up in trade when they could have had the player without giving up any assets for him at all?CarltonTheBear said:...The fact that they've cleared waivers might make them more appealing to another team.
Hobbes said:The logic of that escapes me. Why would a team now be willing to give something up in trade when they could have had the player without giving up any assets for him at all?CarltonTheBear said:...The fact that they've cleared waivers might make them more appealing to another team.
Coco-puffs said:Hobbes said:The logic of that escapes me. Why would a team now be willing to give something up in trade when they could have had the player without giving up any assets for him at all?CarltonTheBear said:...The fact that they've cleared waivers might make them more appealing to another team.
I'd assume the assets they'd have to give up are very little... but they become more attractive to interested teams because the team can acquire the player and they can play in either the NHL or the AHL since they've cleared waivers. I believe the Leafs acquired Hutchinson AFTER Florida had cleared him through waivers. The flexibility of sending him down if they wanted to without risking losing him on waivers was beneficial.
Hobbes said:Okay...I suppose I can see that provided the expected trade value is something almost negligible (late round pick or whatever)
CarltonTheBear said:https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/1192849661964500992
There we go. Marlies are going to be insane.
I should say it's possible one of these guys still gets traded in the near future. The fact that they've cleared waivers might make them more appealing to another team.
Frank E said:CarltonTheBear said:https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/1192849661964500992
There we go. Marlies are going to be insane.
I should say it's possible one of these guys still gets traded in the near future. The fact that they've cleared waivers might make them more appealing to another team.
Do they have to be sent to the Marlies, or can they just hang out and practice with the Leafs?
Frank E said:Do they have to be sent to the Marlies, or can they just hang out and practice with the Leafs?
Frank E said:I figure the Marlies are full of defencemen at the moment, and still have Duszak and Hollowell with the Growlers (hehe)...combine this with them wanting Sandin and Liljegren to be playing big minutes. I don't think there is really a need for Marincin to be with the Marlies.
CarltonTheBear said:Frank E said:I figure the Marlies are full of defencemen at the moment, and still have Duszak and Hollowell with the Growlers (hehe)...combine this with them wanting Sandin and Liljegren to be playing big minutes. I don't think there is really a need for Marincin to be with the Marlies.
The Marlies have done a pretty good job so far balancing their defence group. They've used 8 defencemen and so far Liljegren is the only one to play all 11 games. The pairs have generally looked like this:
Sandin (7GP)-Liljegren (11GP)
Harpur (9)-Schmaltz (9)
Kivihalme (9)-Gravel (6)
Rubins (8 )-Lindgren (7)
Granted this was slightly easier earlier in the season when one of Sandin or Gravel were up with the Leafs for a bit. Rotating 9 guys on a consistent basis could be tougher. Maybe Rubins gets sent back to the ECHL where he spent most of last season. Or they could look to move Harpur to another AHL team that needs him. I doubt he's anywhere in the Leafs future plans.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Screw it. Bring up 38 & 37, waive Ceci & Barrie, and let's get on with the future of the Leafs D.
CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Screw it. Bring up 38 & 37, waive Ceci & Barrie, and let's get on with the future of the Leafs D.
I know this was said somewhat in jest, but if Barrie's play doesn't improve by say January I wonder if the Leafs just admit that he wasn't a good fit and explore flipping him. I think that's more likely than Ceci being traded at this point.
Of course I'd much rather just see Barrie rebound.
Don't you mean your crap list?Frank E said:CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Screw it. Bring up 38 & 37, waive Ceci & Barrie, and let's get on with the future of the Leafs D.
I know this was said somewhat in jest, but if Barrie's play doesn't improve by say January I wonder if the Leafs just admit that he wasn't a good fit and explore flipping him. I think that's more likely than Ceci being traded at this point.
Of course I'd much rather just see Barrie rebound.
He's on my shit list too.
Living in Toronto, I for one, don't want to take any more of Barrie's crap.Highlander said:Don't you mean your crap list?Frank E said:CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Screw it. Bring up 38 & 37, waive Ceci & Barrie, and let's get on with the future of the Leafs D.
I know this was said somewhat in jest, but if Barrie's play doesn't improve by say January I wonder if the Leafs just admit that he wasn't a good fit and explore flipping him. I think that's more likely than Ceci being traded at this point.
Of course I'd much rather just see Barrie rebound.
He's on my shit list too.