• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Phaneuf traded to LA

The money Gaborik is owed goes down and his cap hit stays at that price and they can put him on the IR and get the cap space if he is done and they decide they want to spend.

LA like to play the hard nosed style Phaneuf can play and they think having a player that can play is worth not paying Gaborik and him sitting on IR.

To be fair, Phaneuf is probably still capable of being a very good bottom pair guy. Ottawa was playing him against the toughest competition apparently.
 
Bender said:
Why do either team make this trade?

I kinda get it from LA's position - they're trying to beef up their blue line for a run at the last wildcard spot, and they really don't give up much, as Gaborik has really struggled this season and Shore is basically a 3rd line depth type (and Thompson pretty much replaces him). I don't get it from Ottawa's perspective, other than the fact they save some money in terms of real dollars (around $4M in total). In terms of talent/team building, it's an odd choice for them, as there's barely any cap savings (other than potential LTIR, as Gaborik is Gaborik) and they don't really improve for the future.
 
Phaneuf at 5.25M isn?t terrible. Thank you Sens for taking that bullet for us. Even with the salary retention Sens save money but are now a worse team. +Phaneuf and -Gaborik at similar salaries equals a better LA team.
 
Saravelli says $5.5 million in cash savings for the Sens.


bustaheims said:
Bender said:
Why do either team make this trade?

I kinda get it from LA's position - they're trying to beef up their blue line for a run at the last wildcard spot, and they really don't give up much, as Gaborik has really struggled this season and Shore is basically a 3rd line depth type (and Thompson pretty much replaces him). I don't get it from Ottawa's perspective, other than the fact they save some money in terms of real dollars (around $4M in total). In terms of talent/team building, it's an odd choice for them, as there's barely any cap savings (other than potential LTIR, as Gaborik is Gaborik) and they don't really improve for the future.
 
Bates said:
Saravelli says $5.5 million in cash savings for the Sens.


bustaheims said:
Bender said:
Why do either team make this trade?

I kinda get it from LA's position - they're trying to beef up their blue line for a run at the last wildcard spot, and they really don't give up much, as Gaborik has really struggled this season and Shore is basically a 3rd line depth type (and Thompson pretty much replaces him). I don't get it from Ottawa's perspective, other than the fact they save some money in terms of real dollars (around $4M in total). In terms of talent/team building, it's an odd choice for them, as there's barely any cap savings (other than potential LTIR, as Gaborik is Gaborik) and they don't really improve for the future.
More money for seat tarps! I usually enjoy razing them but now I?m afraid to because they might be heading towards folding.
 
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:
To be fair, Phaneuf is probably still capable of being a very good bottom pair guy. Ottawa was playing him against the toughest competition apparently.

They'll almost certainly play him somewhere in their top-4. I wouldn't even be surprised if they tried him with Doughty initially. His most common defence partner so far this season has been Derek Forbort.
 
It's kind of neat that the Senators lost Marc Methot to Vegas because Phaneuf wouldn't waive his no-movement clause in the summer, and then Ottawa later had to retain Phaneuf salary and take on Gaborik's contract to get rid of him, while Phaneuf gets to leave the sinking ship.

This pleases me.
 
Bates said:
Saravelli says $5.5 million in cash savings for the Sens.

Yeah. The original report I read didn't include the cost savings from Thompsons vs Shore (which, I suppose, also depends on what happens with Shore going forward, as he's an RFA this summer). The $4M figure is what they save specifically from flipping Phaneuf at 25% retained for Gaborik.
 
Heroic Shrimp said:
It's kind of neat that the Senators lost Marc Methot to Vegas because Phaneuf wouldn't waive his no-movement clause in the summer, and then Ottawa later had to retain Phaneuf salary and take on Gaborik's contract to get rid of him, while Phaneuf gets to leave the sinking ship.

This pleases me.

Kind of funny, Phaneuf probably assumed, like the rest of the hockey world, that Vegas would be hot garbage this season and he didn't want to be part of a bottom feeder team...then he stays in Ottawa and he's part of a bottom feeder team....
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top