louisstamos
Active member
herman said:
I didn't, and can't seem to find it!
R1, G1: Lightning @ Leafs - May 2nd, 7:30pm - CBC, Fan 590
- Thread starter CarltonTheBear
- Start date
I didn't, and can't seem to find it!
Heroic Shrimp
New member
By my quick calculations, the Leafs were outhit 56-35, which doesn?t matter to me in the least. But I mention it because if the Leafs had lost 5-0, I guarantee there would be multiple talking heads telling us that Tampa outhitting the Leafs 56-35 was a big reason why Tampa won.
louisstamos
Active member
herman said:
bustaheims
Active member
Heroic Shrimp said:
Obviously, it was the officials who kept Tampa from scoring on the 5 minute PP. I thought that was clear to everyone.
Methot has very clearly/blatantly been leaning hard into the anti-Leafs thing for awhile now in an attempt to build up his online following/turn that into a bigger media job. Paying any attention to him, even mockingly, is basically just helping him succeed.
bustaheims
Active member
CarltonTheBear said:
With hot takes like that, he'll be great on Ottawa region radio broadcasts. And nowhere else.
bustaheims
Active member
Also, the fix:
https://twitter.com/capsboybebop/status/1521309536543461379
https://twitter.com/capsboybebop/status/1521309536543461379
https://twitter.com/TheFourthPeriod/status/1521514996576010240
What did Simmonds even do?
What did Simmonds even do?
bustaheims
Active member
CarltonTheBear said:
He turned back and defended his teammates, which, clearly, is not sportsmanlike.
https://twitter.com/Sportsnet/status/1521307853981687808
Ok actually I missed what happened during the commercial break. Simmonds going after Hedman right after things calmed down (which then caused things to explode again) is probably worthy of a fine.
Ok actually I missed what happened during the commercial break. Simmonds going after Hedman right after things calmed down (which then caused things to explode again) is probably worthy of a fine.
Guru Tugginmypuddah
Active member
louisstamos said:
Tell 'em Sheik!
I'm sure I'd be a lot more upset if that goal mattered at all but as is I'm fine with the call. It was called a no-goal on the ice and the replay is close enough that maybe that whole paralax or whatever angle stuff came into play here to make it look inconclusive. It was probably a goal though.
The bigger question is how is it the year 2022 and the NHL still hasn't been able to figure out a way to conclusively determine if a puck crossed a goal line even with a camera directly above it.
The bigger question is how is it the year 2022 and the NHL still hasn't been able to figure out a way to conclusively determine if a puck crossed a goal line even with a camera directly above it.
WhatIfGodWasALeaf
Active member
CarltonTheBear said:
I was surprised Sportsnet didn't show what happened. After the commercial ESPN spent minutes and repeated replays showing exactly what happened.