Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nik the Trik said:He's clearly been inspired by all of the Ron Wilson nostalgia we've seen.
Rebel_1812 said:Nik the Trik said:He's clearly been inspired by all of the Ron Wilson nostalgia we've seen.
I pity any team that goes with him as a coach.
L K said:Rebel_1812 said:Nik the Trik said:He's clearly been inspired by all of the Ron Wilson nostalgia we've seen.
I pity any team that goes with him as a coach.
Wilson did a lot of bad things in Toronto but I think that's really unfair. The media had it out for him from the get-go and were on him for everything. If the Leafs played as poorly as they have this year under Wilson every single day would have been a "Fire Wilson watch - Day #" article.
Outside of Toronto Wilson's coaching record is - 518-426-101-47
That's a career 89 point pace, with half his coaching career outside of the shootout era.
Paul Maurice outside of Toronto has a career coaching record of 389-392-99-46. That is an 82 point pace over his career. Again, partially affected by having years prior to the shootout. Maurice keeps getting coaching opportunities, albeit he usually gets stuck coaching garbage rosters.
If a team is looking, Wilson at the very least has a track record of getting teams into the postseason (outside of Toronto and his early days in Anaheim).
Some of Wilson's performance as coach of the Leafs is numbed by the passing years, but really when you look at the improvement of the forward unit over the last 2-3 years and the difference in goaltending from Maurice's Andrew Raycroft/Vesa Toskala + JS Aubin/Mikael Tellqvist and Wilson's Toskala/injured Giguere + Joseph/Pogge/Gustavsson (wrecked by Allaire)
to Bernier + Reimer for Carlyle. It's honestly a joke.
His defensive schemes are lacking, but with a fast team with good goaltending, he would be able to at least have them play a strong up-tempo game. If anything, his problem in Toronto was that he did the same things that Carlyle is guilty of. He stuck to a system that didn't work (played too much offense with a team that couldn't handle it) and picked whipping boys that probably were the wrong ones to call out (Kaberle, early Kadri auditions, Tlusty).
Rebel_1812 said:L K said:Rebel_1812 said:Nik the Trik said:He's clearly been inspired by all of the Ron Wilson nostalgia we've seen.
I pity any team that goes with him as a coach.
Wilson did a lot of bad things in Toronto but I think that's really unfair. The media had it out for him from the get-go and were on him for everything. If the Leafs played as poorly as they have this year under Wilson every single day would have been a "Fire Wilson watch - Day #" article.
Outside of Toronto Wilson's coaching record is - 518-426-101-47
That's a career 89 point pace, with half his coaching career outside of the shootout era.
Paul Maurice outside of Toronto has a career coaching record of 389-392-99-46. That is an 82 point pace over his career. Again, partially affected by having years prior to the shootout. Maurice keeps getting coaching opportunities, albeit he usually gets stuck coaching garbage rosters.
If a team is looking, Wilson at the very least has a track record of getting teams into the postseason (outside of Toronto and his early days in Anaheim).
Some of Wilson's performance as coach of the Leafs is numbed by the passing years, but really when you look at the improvement of the forward unit over the last 2-3 years and the difference in goaltending from Maurice's Andrew Raycroft/Vesa Toskala + JS Aubin/Mikael Tellqvist and Wilson's Toskala/injured Giguere + Joseph/Pogge/Gustavsson (wrecked by Allaire)
to Bernier + Reimer for Carlyle. It's honestly a joke.
His defensive schemes are lacking, but with a fast team with good goaltending, he would be able to at least have them play a strong up-tempo game. If anything, his problem in Toronto was that he did the same things that Carlyle is guilty of. He stuck to a system that didn't work (played too much offense with a team that couldn't handle it) and picked whipping boys that probably were the wrong ones to call out (Kaberle, early Kadri auditions, Tlusty).
No it is a fair assessment of him as a coach. The San Jose rosters that he coached had the talent to win cups. The fact that the teams were high on talent but short on results show he didn't know how to get the most out of his teams. That is why San Jose finally gave up on him, even though they keep making the playoffs.
L K said:Not sure how San Jose firing Wilson and still not winning a Cup proves Wilson's failing. Personally, I agree, Wilson's playoff record sucks. He took good-to-great Sharks rosters to playoff mediocrity. But for some team out there that can't even make the playoffs, getting there is worth something. Look at how celebratory we looked at a Leafs playoff run that had them lose in the 1st round last year.
Nik the Trik said:L K said:Not sure how San Jose firing Wilson and still not winning a Cup proves Wilson's failing. Personally, I agree, Wilson's playoff record sucks. He took good-to-great Sharks rosters to playoff mediocrity. But for some team out there that can't even make the playoffs, getting there is worth something. Look at how celebratory we looked at a Leafs playoff run that had them lose in the 1st round last year.
But those Sharks teams didn't make the playoffs because of Wilson. They made the playoffs because they were good teams. So while San Jose's playoff near identical post-Wilson performance isn't evidence of his "Failure" it should at least drive home the point that coaches don't have too much of an effect on a team's performance.
L K said:To an extent, sure. Talented teams in general should win games, while talentless teams are unlikely to win. If the Leafs replaced Phil Kessel with Jason Blake, they wouldn't be very good.
But a coach can have a pretty significant impact on the style of play of the team, and if the fit is good, they should be able to exact a good result out of the team. Similarly, a coach who doesn't fit the team well, can disadvantage that talent by taking them out of positions to succeed.
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/sbnation/SBNation_20140124_Do_in-season_NHL_coaching_changes_work_.html
CarltonTheBear said:I love when people bring up the fact that a team is over. 500 as if that's some big accomplishment in this day and age. Screw the loser point, the Leafs have now lost more games than they've won this season.
bustaheims said:CarltonTheBear said:I love when people bring up the fact that a team is over. 500 as if that's some big accomplishment in this day and age. Screw the loser point, the Leafs have now lost more games than they've won this season.
Seriously. A .500 team these days is a bottom 10 team.
Bender said:Exactly. Saying they won more than they lost is not useful if the team is not in a position to be competitive in the actual standings.