hockeyfan1
New member
Corey Crawford vs Jonathan Quick, Jonathan Toews vs Dustin Brown, Brent Seabrook vs Drew Doughty, etc.
This promises to be an interesting, hard-hitting, good goaltending type of series between two teams both known for their different styles and a plethora of talent as well as experience. Experience?
Firstly, these two teams are both former Stanley Cup champions (Chicago in 2010-11 and L.A. in 2011-12). While not every player has remained for the Kings nor Hawks, there are plenty of key people with enough experience to make a difference for both clubs. Chicago has Toews, Kane, Hossa, Keith, Seabrook, guys who've been there, done that.
Los Angeles has Brown, Carter, Penner, Doughty, Richards, plus a capable goaltender in Quick, Conn Smythe Trophy winner last season.
Notice that Corey Crawford's name wasn't inserted in the above paragraph. Crawford has no Cup experience. That is the difference between him and Quick. Would it matter? That depends on the performance of the opposition in front of him. The Kings Quick has been known to start off sloppy then gets better and better as a series wears on. Of course, Chicago's Crawford is no slouch either, having come up with the big saves when called upon, and having provided excellent goaltending throughout the season for the Hawks.
Which goaltender will outplay each other? Take your pick.
Both teams have had similar series (Detroit for Chicago 4 games to 3 series win for the Hawks and in Game 7 in OT) and (San Jose for Los Angeles 4 game to 3 series win for the Kings and in Game 7 in OT).
L.A. sported the best home record in the regular season, while Chicago sported the best record overall. Since the United Center has one of the loudest fans in the league, and since the Staples Center has been like gold for the Kings, how these teams fare on home ice may tell the tale of who will be more advantageous in this Conference Final. Tune in.
This promises to be an interesting, hard-hitting, good goaltending type of series between two teams both known for their different styles and a plethora of talent as well as experience. Experience?
Firstly, these two teams are both former Stanley Cup champions (Chicago in 2010-11 and L.A. in 2011-12). While not every player has remained for the Kings nor Hawks, there are plenty of key people with enough experience to make a difference for both clubs. Chicago has Toews, Kane, Hossa, Keith, Seabrook, guys who've been there, done that.
Los Angeles has Brown, Carter, Penner, Doughty, Richards, plus a capable goaltender in Quick, Conn Smythe Trophy winner last season.
Notice that Corey Crawford's name wasn't inserted in the above paragraph. Crawford has no Cup experience. That is the difference between him and Quick. Would it matter? That depends on the performance of the opposition in front of him. The Kings Quick has been known to start off sloppy then gets better and better as a series wears on. Of course, Chicago's Crawford is no slouch either, having come up with the big saves when called upon, and having provided excellent goaltending throughout the season for the Hawks.
Which goaltender will outplay each other? Take your pick.
Both teams have had similar series (Detroit for Chicago 4 games to 3 series win for the Hawks and in Game 7 in OT) and (San Jose for Los Angeles 4 game to 3 series win for the Kings and in Game 7 in OT).
L.A. sported the best home record in the regular season, while Chicago sported the best record overall. Since the United Center has one of the loudest fans in the league, and since the Staples Center has been like gold for the Kings, how these teams fare on home ice may tell the tale of who will be more advantageous in this Conference Final. Tune in.