• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2013 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

Potvin29 said:
Let's judge it on 2 starts, that makes sense.

His April stats last season were noticeably worse than the rest of his season, too.

Worse as in as bad as this season or just not elite? I mean the worrying thing is that he has elite career numbers in the NL and horrific career numbers in the AL.

Let's hope his numbers in the NL are the "real" R.A> Dickey and not his AL numbers.

There's legitimate reason for concern IMO.
 
TML fan said:
It makes at least as much sense as hyping a team that hadn't even played a game.

Excitement for what looks like a legitimate playoff team is not the same as complaining about the reigning NL Cy Young winner after 9 innings pitched.
 
Verlander, Strasburg, Cueto all off to bad starts this afternoon. I think all three teams and their fans should panic.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Worse as in as bad as this season or just not elite. I mean the worrying thing is that he has elite career numbers in the NL and horrific career numbers in the AL.

Let's hope his numbers in the NL are the "real" R.A> Dickey and not his AL numbers.

There's legitimate reason for concern IMO.
There's concern that maybe the Jays paid too much at the wrong time, but you really need to put some context into Dickey's career numbers. The majority of his time spent in the AL, he was not throwing a knuckleball.
 
Sarrrge said:
Verlander, Strasburg, Customer all off to bad starts this afternoon. I think all three teams and their fans should panic.

I mean, really? Verlander already pitched a 5 inning shutout for a win (Strasburg same thing over 7) . Dickey got hammered and has done so again in his second start. These things are equatable how?
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Sarrrge said:
Verlander, Strasburg, Customer all off to bad starts this afternoon. I think all three teams and their fans should panic.

I mean, really? Verlander already pitched a 5 inning shutout for a win (Strasburg same thing over 7) . Dickey got hammered and has done so again in his second start. These things are equatable how?

They're are equitable because 2 starts shows you little to nothing more than 1.
 
#1PilarFan said:
TML fan said:
It makes at least as much sense as hyping a team that hadn't even played a game.

Excitement for what looks like a legitimate playoff team is not the same as complaining about the reigning NL Cy Young winner after 9 innings pitched.

You're right. Dickey has actually played a game.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Potvin29 said:
Let's judge it on 2 starts, that makes sense.

His April stats last season were noticeably worse than the rest of his season, too.

Worse as in as bad as this season or just not elite? I mean the worrying thing is that he has elite career numbers in the NL and horrific career numbers in the AL.

Let's hope his numbers in the NL are the "real" R.A> Dickey and not his AL numbers.

There's legitimate reason for concern IMO.

But he wasn't throwing the knuckleball in the AL (or he was just starting to) so it's unfair to compare his AL numbers to his NL numbers.  They are basically two different pitchers.

EDIT: And his April ERA last season was 4.45 with 10 BB & 7 HR allowed.  The rest of the way it was 2.48.  That April also included a 4.1 IP, 8 ER game.  He didn't allow more than 5 runs in a game the rest of the season.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Sarrrge said:
Verlander, Strasburg, Customer all off to bad starts this afternoon. I think all three teams and their fans should panic.

I mean, really? Verlander already pitched a 5 inning shutout for a win (Strasburg same thing over 7) . Dickey got hammered and has done so again in his second start. These things are equatable how?

Didn't really get hammered did he? 3 earned runs isn't a great start, but not the worst end of the spectrum.
 
Potvin29 said:
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Sarrrge said:
Verlander, Strasburg, Customer all off to bad starts this afternoon. I think all three teams and their fans should panic.

I mean, really? Verlander already pitched a 5 inning shutout for a win (Strasburg same thing over 7) . Dickey got hammered and has done so again in his second start. These things are equatable how?

Didn't really get hammered did he? 3 earned runs isn't a great start, but not the worst end of the spectrum.

8 R with ONLY 7 ER in 4 IP? Only 1 BB? Yeah I'll stick with hammered...
 
Red Sox BABIP vs. Dickey is .563 through 4 innings.  Last season the BABIP for Dickey was .280, and in his first start was .222.  This is an outlier.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Potvin29 said:
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Sarrrge said:
Verlander, Strasburg, Customer all off to bad starts this afternoon. I think all three teams and their fans should panic.

I mean, really? Verlander already pitched a 5 inning shutout for a win (Strasburg same thing over 7) . Dickey got hammered and has done so again in his second start. These things are equatable how?

Didn't really get hammered did he? 3 earned runs isn't a great start, but not the worst end of the spectrum.

8 R with ONLY 7 ER in 4 IP? Only 1 BB? Yeah I'll stick with hammered...

If you will refer to your original post, you used hammered to refer to his first start, in which Dickey allowed 3 ER, so I also was referring to his first start.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
8 R with ONLY 7 ER in 4 IP? Only 1 BB? Yeah I'll stick with hammered...
I think he's referring to the Dickey's first start, where he pitched 6 innings and allowed 3ER. That's not what we traded for, but that's no one's definition of getting "hammered".
 
Potvin29 said:
Red Sox BABIP vs. Dickey is .563 through 4 innings.  Last season the BABIP for Dickey was .280, and in his first start was .222.  This is an outlier.

Ok, on one hand he's not this bad, but his career numbers and history tell us pitching in the AL is a fair bit harder than in the NL.

So far that bit of wisdom is holding true.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Potvin29 said:
Red Sox BABIP vs. Dickey is .563 through 4 innings.  Last season the BABIP for Dickey was .280, and in his first start was .222.  This is an outlier.

Ok, on one hand he's not this bad, but his career numbers and history tell us pitching in the AL is a fair bit harder than in the NL.

So far that bit of wisdom is holding true.

But he also got "hammered" in some of his early NL starts last season too.

The point is, it's too early to come to any conclusions about Dickey, and there's no point over-reacting to single outings in a long season.
 
Potvin29 said:
Red Sox BABIP vs. Dickey is .563 through 4 innings.  Last season the BABIP for Dickey was .280, and in his first start was .222.  This is an outlier.

You're misusing BABIP a little. It's really meant as more of a stat to take in large sample sizes with the assumption that a deviation from the norm is attributable to luck/defense. In a one day sense a bad BABIP can just mean a pitcher is pitching poorly.

Besides, his walk rate/HR allowed aren't so his defense independent numbers would be lousy anyway.
 
It's obviously not something to draw a conclusion from yet but it'd be interesting if the Red Sox were a team that consistently hit Dickey well being as John Farrell has a good deal of experience coaching Tim Wakefield.
 
Nik said:
Potvin29 said:
Red Sox BABIP vs. Dickey is .563 through 4 innings.  Last season the BABIP for Dickey was .280, and in his first start was .222.  This is an outlier.

You're misusing BABIP a little. It's really meant as more of a stat to take in large sample sizes with the assumption that a deviation from the norm is attributable to luck/defense. In a one day sense a bad BABIP can just mean a pitcher is pitching poorly.

Besides, his walk rate/HR allowed aren't so his defense independent numbers would be lousy anyway.

Oh I'm aware of that.  I think the point still stands that this is not something that will continue, so no point drawing too many conclusions from it.
 
Potvin29 said:
Oh I'm aware of that.  I think the point still stands that this is not something that will continue, so no point drawing too many conclusions from it.

Well, I agree that you can't read too much into one start but I don't know if we should just point to last year as evidence of what will or won't happen this year. Beyond the basic year to year inconsistencies that can hit pitchers there are, I think we can agree, more question marks surrounding Dickey than most.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top