mr grieves said:
Significantly Insignificant said:
CarltonTheBear said:
bustaheims said:
Leafs' loss on Tuesday combined with Boston's win last night likely puts passing the Bruins out of reach for the Leafs.
I'd wait until the game vs. Boston on Monday to say that. A loss there shuts the door, a win still keeps it open (albeit slightly).
Yeah the two games at hand mitigates some of the required effort to catch them. Although the Leafs do need to win those two games at hand. I would say that back to back loses in the next couple of games pretty much puts the playoffs out of reach.
Which all told, isn't all that much of a bad thing.
The good things:
1. Somewhat higher pick
2. Can shut down Rielly for the season
3. Can call up some AHLers for a few games
The bad things:
1. Result of tailing off in play, not injury, raising questions about the coach's ability to get the most of what he's got. Or maybe the core. But if you were told Kadri was going to have a career year, JvR would be around all season, three top rookies would be on ~60 point paces, the guy from Russia would be solid, and the goaltending would be league average, wouldn't you expect them to be on the inside?
No. All those things sound great, but you have to put them in to context League wide and in reference to where this team was last year. Kadri having a career year still puts him at 30 goals. That effectively replaces the 30 goals the team lost when Kessel left. The Kessel teams missed the playoffs so it isn't all that surprising that a team that finishes near the bottom that then replaces that doesn't move the needle forward all that much. Ditto the same argument for JVR. He played full seasons with Kessel. So with those two acheivements maybe you are getting a team back in to the bottom 5 - bottom 8 area that the team would finish during those years. That's where the team would finish in those years, but the team that the Leafs had last year, finished dead last in the league. Perhaps not as bad as the Avalanche of this year, but still pretty bad.
Having three rookies that are scoring at a 60 point pace is great. It means that the offense is probably more consistent. However, rookies make mistakes. There are bound to be goals scored when they are on the ice due to those mistakes. This means that the defensive side is a little weaker. So the gains in offense come at the price of a loss on the defensive side. How much does that move the needle from a dead last team, or even a bottom 5 to bottom 8 to the top 16?
Zaitsev has been pretty solid for much of the season, but the Leafs had Phanuef for 51 games last year, and he was pretty solid as well. So again, how much does replacing Phanuef with a solid rookie move the needle on this team towards a playoff contender?
As for the goaltending here are the numbers for the Leafs from 2015-2016:
Player Name GP Min GA GAA W L T Svs Pct EN SO
James Reimer 32 1797 75 2.49 11 12 7 845 0.918 4 0
Jonathan Bernier 38 2131 103 2.88 12 21 3 1011 0.908 7 3
Garret Sparks 17 970 49 3.02 6 9 1 407 0.893 2 1
How much better is that than this:
# Name GP Min GA GAA W L T ENG SO Saves SvPct
30 Antoine Bibeau 2 122 4 1.99 1 1 0 0 0 51 0.927
35 Curtis McElhinney 8 447 20 2.70 3 4 0 0 1 233 0.921
31 Frederik Andersen 56 3287 149 2.73 27 15 13 0 3 1619 0.916
35 Jhonas Enroth 6 277 18 3.94 0 3 1 0 0 123 0.872
Just a quick look at the numbers would seem to indicate that the goaltending is performing around the same rate as last year.
So adding all this up, I think it's fair to say they have overachieved to get where they are at and the individual accomplishments that some of the players are enjoying aren't enough to push this team into the upper echelon. Therefore I don't think missing the playoffs should raise any questions.
Also you can do this excercise with other teams. If I told you that a team had a top 5 scorer in the League, the top scoring rookie three other forwards who were flirting with a 60 point pace, a true #1 dman and a solid top four d group, would you expect them to be on the outside looking in for the playoffs at this point in the season?
When looking at the Leafs today, it isn't about what they can do today. It's about what they can do in three years. The concern that I have currently, is how are they going to improve the defence.