OldTimeHockey
Well-known member
herman said:https://twitter.com/pitchingninja/status/1433985039423901698
They look identical coming out of his hand. Amazing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
herman said:https://twitter.com/pitchingninja/status/1433985039423901698
herman said:Seems like there?s a generation of athlete/athlete adjacent people who are very sensitive sore losers and need to bundle themselves up in unwritten rules to protect their emotions or else there will be violent retaliation.
CarltonTheBear said:9-0 and your opponent has apparently given up despite there being 3 innings left? I dunno that seems like a good time to practice plays like bunts in a real game with little pressure on you.
bustaheims said:herman said:Seems like there?s a generation of athlete/athlete adjacent people who are very sensitive sore losers and need to bundle themselves up in unwritten rules to protect their emotions or else there will be violent retaliation.
I'm torn on this one. On one hand, I don't have an issue with teams running up the score. You never give up an opportunity to hit the ball and hit it hard. On the other hand, bunting for a hit feels like scratching and clawing for runs, which you don't need to do when you're up by 9.
Nik said:I've always felt there was a pretty decent equilibrium there. You can bunt whenever you want but keep in mind that there are times when you do it that might result in you getting thrown at later(and, likewise, being thrown at should not be with 95+ fastball anywhere particularly dangerous).
This argument always strikes me as weird because it seems like the new school take of "bunting during blowouts isn't the end of the world but being thrown at is" is just as hysterical as anything the old school guardians say.
Nik said:bustaheims said:herman said:Seems like there?s a generation of athlete/athlete adjacent people who are very sensitive sore losers and need to bundle themselves up in unwritten rules to protect their emotions or else there will be violent retaliation.
I'm torn on this one. On one hand, I don't have an issue with teams running up the score. You never give up an opportunity to hit the ball and hit it hard. On the other hand, bunting for a hit feels like scratching and clawing for runs, which you don't need to do when you're up by 9.
I've always felt there was a pretty decent equilibrium there. You can bunt whenever you want but keep in mind that there are times when you do it that might result in you getting thrown at later(and, likewise, being thrown at should not be with 95+ fastball anywhere particularly dangerous).
This argument always strikes me as weird because it seems like the new school take of "bunting during blowouts isn't the end of the world but being thrown at is" is just as hysterical as anything the old school guardians say.
L K said:Clayton Kershaw - 53 strikes, 27 balls. 13K 0BB 0 Hits 0 Wild pitches 0 Errors
Gets pulled 7 innings into a perfect game.
Dappleganger said:L K said:Clayton Kershaw - 53 strikes, 27 balls. 13K 0BB 0 Hits 0 Wild pitches 0 Errors
Gets pulled 7 innings into a perfect game.
I hate this.
L K said:I mean there is a huge difference between intentionally throwing at a player and hurting their feelings by getting a base hit.
L K said:What if I changed it around to say that it's acceptable to pull a Michigan in a 4-goal lead but you should expect a crosscheck to the face for doing it?
Nik said:Then I'd say there's a bit of a difference just in terms of consequences. Getting crosschecked in the face is not a natural thing that occurs within the context of a hockey game outside of the accepted level of player on player violence in the game. Conversely any of these guys playing pro baseball has been hit by a baseball almost certainly dozens of times, usually with no ill intent on anyone's part. It's such a common part of the game that you get taught, effectively, to minimize the damage of it by turning your butt or back to it. 9 times out of 10 it stings a bit, or leaves a bruise, and you move on. Getting plunked in the butt isn't a major or consequential penalty for doing something seen by some as disrespectful even if you don't agree with that interpretation.
I agree. Bunting for a hit in general is about trying to catch an opponent by surprise. Doing it 9 runs up **really** and kind of unfairly adds to the surprise. It?s hard not to call it unsportsmanlike.bustaheims said:herman said:Seems like there?s a generation of athlete/athlete adjacent people who are very sensitive sore losers and need to bundle themselves up in unwritten rules to protect their emotions or else there will be violent retaliation.
I'm torn on this one. On one hand, I don't have an issue with teams running up the score. You never give up an opportunity to hit the ball and hit it hard. On the other hand, bunting for a hit feels like scratching and clawing for runs, which you don't need to do when you're up by 9.