herman
Well-known member
At this stage of the contention window, Cliff Fletcher rules apply. And at the end of the contention window, trading out the really good pieces that are too old for the next crest of the wave will net very solid future assets.I know the playoff roster isn't the same as the Opening night one, but the Leafs are in such a poor position to make trades right now.
We can trade roster players too. Everything south of Matthews/Nylander/Knies/Tavares at forward and every defenseman not named Tanev and McCabe are fair game.
I like Cowan and Danford a whole lot (and Minten and Grebyonkin) but if they can pull in a real NHL top-6 or puck-moving defenseman, it's getting done, especially if there is term attached. The mileage on the Laughton and Carlo trades might vary by opinion, but I'd argue the Leafs got more present day value from those picks and prospects than if they had hung on and drafted with them. Getting the depth C and defensive RD gaps filled for low cap hits with term looks like it cost a lot in futures* but it would've cost way more against cap flexibility if we pursued it through UFA. Getting Roy out of the Marner situation was also extremely positive for the circumstances, saving assets that might have otherwise been spent getting a credible centre from the market that basically has none.
* future picks and prospects still multiple years away from NHL production are basically only worthwhile for getting current players