Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
herman said:I think he just ran out of ideas at the end.
How can we get Byfield and then sign Roy as a UFA...
CarltonTheBear said:herman said:I think he just ran out of ideas at the end.
How can we get Byfield and then sign Roy as a UFA...
I think the window of LA potentially moving Byfield has closed.
CarltonTheBear said:herman said:I think he just ran out of ideas at the end.
How can we get Byfield and then sign Roy as a UFA...
I think the window of LA potentially moving Byfield has closed.
herman said:Matthews - no problem
Let us also not forget how much each star player generates without another star player on their line
Matthews - no problem
Nylander - no problem
Tavares - he's not young anymore and not fast, but has a history of elevating linemates that mesh with him
Marner - has never really flown solo before until this series and looked like Kerfoot in this small sample
I have a hard time believing Tavares will waive his no-movement clause, but I?m not convinced that is the same case for Marner. Speaking with those close to his camp, the belief is he would, and should, consider alternative options if the Leafs seek a trade. And no, the Leafs are not going to move him for a package surrounded by future assets. If they go down this road, and teams have already poked around, it?s a talent-for-talent swap.
herman said:https://www.thefourthperiod.com/pagnotta/cup-or-bust-mentality-for-toronto
It?s just Pagnotta, but not the first time we?ve heard components of this
I have a hard time believing Tavares will waive his no-movement clause, but I?m not convinced that is the same case for Marner. Speaking with those close to his camp, the belief is he would, and should, consider alternative options if the Leafs seek a trade. And no, the Leafs are not going to move him for a package surrounded by future assets. If they go down this road, and teams have already poked around, it?s a talent-for-talent swap.
Nashville is the destination posited (Juuse Saros in part of the return). Funny if Ryan O?Reilly comes right back in the deal.
Give me Askarov plus some other young guys.Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington said:herman said:https://www.thefourthperiod.com/pagnotta/cup-or-bust-mentality-for-toronto
It?s just Pagnotta, but not the first time we?ve heard components of this
I have a hard time believing Tavares will waive his no-movement clause, but I?m not convinced that is the same case for Marner. Speaking with those close to his camp, the belief is he would, and should, consider alternative options if the Leafs seek a trade. And no, the Leafs are not going to move him for a package surrounded by future assets. If they go down this road, and teams have already poked around, it?s a talent-for-talent swap.
Nashville is the destination posited (Juuse Saros in part of the return). Funny if Ryan O?Reilly comes right back in the deal.
I'd dig a trade involving Saros.
Are Anaheim a bit too far back in their rebuild to be a trading partner?
Deebo said:Cap situation:
Auston Matthews 13,250,000 William Nylander 11,500,000 John Tavares 11,000,000 Mitchell Marner 10,903,000 David Kampf 2,400,000 Calle Jarnkrok 2,100,000 Bobby McMann 1,350,000 Ryan Reaves 1,350,000 Matthew Knies 925,000 Pontus Holmberg 800,000 --------- ---------Morgan Rielly 7,500,000 Jake McCabe 2,000,000 Simon Benoit 1,350,000 Connor Timmins 1,100,000 --------- ---------Joseph Woll 766,667 --------- ---------Total 68,294,667 --------- ---------Cap 87,700,000 --------- ---------Room 19,405,333
RFAs:
Nicholas Robertson
Connor Dewar
Noah Gregor
Max Ellis
Alex Steeves
Timothy Liljegren
Maxime Lajoie
Keith Petruzelli
Guilt Trip said:Leafs need to lose Kampf and Jarnkrok.
herman said:Deebo said:Cap situation:
Auston Matthews 13,250,000 William Nylander 11,500,000 John Tavares 11,000,000 Mitchell Marner 10,903,000 David Kampf 2,400,000 Calle Jarnkrok 2,100,000 Bobby McMann 1,350,000 Ryan Reaves 1,350,000 Matthew Knies 925,000 Pontus Holmberg 800,000 --------- ---------Morgan Rielly 7,500,000 Jake McCabe 2,000,000 Simon Benoit 1,350,000 Connor Timmins 1,100,000 --------- ---------Joseph Woll 766,667 --------- ---------Total 68,294,667 --------- ---------Cap 87,700,000 --------- ---------Room 19,405,333
RFAs:
Nicholas Robertson
Connor Dewar
Noah Gregor
Max Ellis
Alex Steeves
Timothy Liljegren
Maxime Lajoie
Keith Petruzelli
In addition to this list are some players who have signed ELCs/SPCs vying for a spot next season, most of them sub 900k: gonna bold the ones that likely get a look
Fraser Minten
Easton Cowan
Nikita Grebenkin
Roni Hirvonen
Ryan Tverberg
Jacob Quillan
Topi Niemela
Mikko Kokkonen
William Villeneuve
Marshall Rifai
Cade Webber
Nicolas Mattinen
Assuming there is no big trade out, the Leafs need to fill 2ish F slots, 3 D slots, and 2 G with the ~20M
Re-signing RFAs Robertson, Dewar, and Liljegren for like 1.3-1.5M each would take up < 5M of that; set aside another 5M for those waiver-bait depth forwards/defense/3rd goalie leaves about 9M for 2 real D + 1 real G. Which would put us at about 42 SPC slots used before we snag waiver-bait (probably 4 more).
Re-signing RFAs Robertson, Dewar, and Liljegren for like 1.3-1.5M each
CarltonTheBear said:I don't think you'd see Nashville having to give up a 1st rounder on their side. Ultimately Marner for Saros mostly straight up feels kinda right, assuming both teams see each player in their best forms. Marner is a perennial 90-point winger with Selke potential, but is coming off (yet another) disappointing playoff run. Saros is a perennial Vezina-ish goalie, but is coming off his weakest season in awhile (was still good granted). Each have 1 year left on their deals before coming UFAs. Marner's AAV is more than double what Saros' is, which made me wonder if the Leafs would need to retain a little to even things up. But on the flip side if the deal is done after July 1st Marner's remaining salary is just a paltry $775k for the season, which may make Nashville content with the difference in cap hits.
Ultimately other things could get involved if there's a desire to make it bigger but as far as the one for one aspect I think the value is already pretty darn close.
Bender said:CarltonTheBear said:I don't think you'd see Nashville having to give up a 1st rounder on their side. Ultimately Marner for Saros mostly straight up feels kinda right, assuming both teams see each player in their best forms. Marner is a perennial 90-point winger with Selke potential, but is coming off (yet another) disappointing playoff run. Saros is a perennial Vezina-ish goalie, but is coming off his weakest season in awhile (was still good granted). Each have 1 year left on their deals before coming UFAs. Marner's AAV is more than double what Saros' is, which made me wonder if the Leafs would need to retain a little to even things up. But on the flip side if the deal is done after July 1st Marner's remaining salary is just a paltry $775k for the season, which may make Nashville content with the difference in cap hits.
Ultimately other things could get involved if there's a desire to make it bigger but as far as the one for one aspect I think the value is already pretty darn close.
I absolutely would not want to trade Marner for a goalie. I know we need one but Marner's our best trade chip and goalies are voodoo.
Bender said:CarltonTheBear said:I don't think you'd see Nashville having to give up a 1st rounder on their side. Ultimately Marner for Saros mostly straight up feels kinda right, assuming both teams see each player in their best forms. Marner is a perennial 90-point winger with Selke potential, but is coming off (yet another) disappointing playoff run. Saros is a perennial Vezina-ish goalie, but is coming off his weakest season in awhile (was still good granted). Each have 1 year left on their deals before coming UFAs. Marner's AAV is more than double what Saros' is, which made me wonder if the Leafs would need to retain a little to even things up. But on the flip side if the deal is done after July 1st Marner's remaining salary is just a paltry $775k for the season, which may make Nashville content with the difference in cap hits.
Ultimately other things could get involved if there's a desire to make it bigger but as far as the one for one aspect I think the value is already pretty darn close.
I absolutely would not want to trade Marner for a goalie. I know we need one but Marner's our best trade chip and goalies are voodoo.
Bill_Berg said:I'm not sure straight up for Saros is the best they can do, but Herman's proposal seems like more than Nashville would pay too.