Can they make you president already?Why are we paying more on the cap for Florida's sloppy seconds when we can just buy their pro-scouting staff off the cap?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can they make you president already?Why are we paying more on the cap for Florida's sloppy seconds when we can just buy their pro-scouting staff off the cap?
I stopped reading when they suggested that we re-sign Holmberg.There's a lot to like in these suggestions, esp Maccelli and Philp acquisitions
I stopped reading when they suggested that we re-sign Holmberg.
It'll be interesting to see how they spread the depth around. If we can get JT on a cheap-ish contract in the 3C slot and get a 2C then I think we're in pretty good shape for further roster building.It looks like there is some value available via UFAs: Kane, Marchand, Toews, C. Brown, J. Benn, R. Smith, and B. Tanev.
Although most of the above are older, we need playoff warriors. Marner or no Marner, I believe this is still a good team.
I think Leafs zeitgeist focuses too much on getting the best skill per dollar on the cap, and not quite enough on players that own the boards where most of the game is spent.
Florida's success is partly due to their really good players at reasonable cap hits (state tax laws help); but primarily it's their playoffs-proven system of fully-bought-in players, that's easy to slot nearly anybody who can skate on to. I think Maurice has done a crazy good job philosophically and tactically. In addition, the front office and coaching staff and players all game their respective systems to the utmost: timely LTIR, cajoling the refs, casual picks against every forecheck and falling onto goalies because oopsie ice is slippery there.
The Leafs are still in the middle of shifting from Dubas/Keefe puck (constant positionless possession*) to Treliving/Berube (win the slot, mucky puck), so their personnel and cap allocations were not in alignment, leading to loss in efficiency (see Leafs PP putting the puck on net vs OTT vs refusing to put the puck on net unless it was highlight of the night worthy vs FLA).
Cap clearing through attrition and transactions will gradually get better alignment. I think the Leafs are trending towards more playoff success, but managerial inaction on the highest impact issue during these past 2-3 offseasons is going to hurt a bit in the short term.
* I believed in this! until 2021. Playoff hockey is a different sport and really the only ruleset that matters.
Are we going to hear from Treliving?
This always bugged me when people tried to justify the very mediocre possession numbers against Ottawa as just being "Berube hockey". When the Blues won the Cup Berube came in mid way and took them from one of the worst possession teams in the league to one of the best. Like sure maybe there's something to be said about how the Dubas/Keefe teams possession wasn't the right kind but constantly being outshot isBut almost all the top playoff teams are also great possession teams. Part of why Florida beat the Leafs is they had the puck the vast majority of the time and anytime the Leafs had it all they could do was ice it or dump it out to centre.
I was of the same mindset. When the Leafs were getting dominated on the shot clock, it was only a matter of time that they started paying for that.This always bugged me when people tried to justify the very mediocre possession numbers against Ottawa as just being "Berube hockey". When the Blues won the Cup Berube came in mid way and took them from one of the worst possession teams in the league to one of the best. Like sure maybe there's something to be said about how the Dubas/Keefe teams possession wasn't the right kind but constantly being outshot isneververy rarely a recipe for success.
But almost all the top playoff teams are also great possession teams. Part of why Florida beat the Leafs is they had the puck the vast majority of the time and anytime the Leafs had it all they could do was ice it or dump it out to centre.
Are we going to hear from Treliving?
The only thing I hope is that maybe this was a "learn to not suck in the defensive zone first" and then branch out with more puck possession moving forward. That just really seems like a hard argument to believe when we are about to watch one of our best puck possession players walk for free.This always bugged me when people tried to justify the very mediocre possession numbers against Ottawa as just being "Berube hockey". When the Blues won the Cup Berube came in mid way and took them from one of the worst possession teams in the league to one of the best. Like sure maybe there's something to be said about how the Dubas/Keefe teams possession wasn't the right kind but constantly being outshot isneververy rarely a recipe for success.
The only thing I hope is that maybe this was a "learn to not suck in the defensive zone first" and then branch out with more puck possession moving forward. That just really seems like a hard argument to believe when we are about to watch one of our best puck possession players walk for free.