Nik the Trik said:Well, let me try just so as to make it seem like I'm not a crazy person. Here are the second best forwards on post-04-05 lockout teams to win the cup(I'm going with a general feel/qualitative evaluation as opposed to just "highest scoring")
...
Where does Kessel rank on that list? The middle of the pack, I think. Below Zetterberg and Malkin I think we can agree, I'd put him below Kane, Getzlaf and maybe Brind'Amour. He's almost certainly ahead of Lucic and the Kings players.
So when I say "not a strength" all I really mean is that in that role I don't think he'd be particularly stronger than what you see on your average cup winner. You know, if Kessel were the team's second best forward right now then to win a cup the team likely still has to go through teams whose second best forwards include guys like Getzlaf(or Perry) or Kane or Malkin or Nash and so on and he's, charitably, a push with those guys. If they were doing one of those old "Who has the edge' features in the Star the way they used to for a playoff series and one of the categories was "2nd best forward" he wouldn't be an easy check mark in any of those cases.
I read all of this though and I think, man, that's pretty good company to be in though. Among his comparables on recent Stanley Cup champions he's only middle of the pack. You're making it sound like Kessel can't be a part of a winning teams core because the Leafs are unlikely to be able to assemble a core that, aside from Kessel, would be comparable to other SC champions. That I can get behind/understand, but that's more of a Leafs-problem than a Kessel-problem.