For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick at: couchmanrick@gmail.com
That's not news. I don't expect to agree with 100% of anyone's decisions. And i agree that RC's coaching looked good in the playoffs too. But the last period collapse had a lot to do with his coaching.
That's not news. I don't expect to agree with 100% of anyone's decisions. And i agree that RC's coaching looked good in the playoffs too. But the last period collapse had a lot to do with his coaching.
That's not news. I don't expect to agree with 100% of anyone's decisions. And i agree that RC's coaching looked good in the playoffs too. But the last period collapse had a lot to do with his coaching.
That's not news. I don't expect to agree with 100% of anyone's decisions. And i agree that RC's coaching looked good in the playoffs too. But the last period collapse had a lot to do with his coaching.
Carlyle was coaching a bubble (according to analysts) Leafs team against a team that won a cup a couple of years ago, and is poised to do so again this year.
Eakins was coaching a Calder finalist roster from 2011 with a few ex-NHLers (Komi, Connolly) against a good grand rapids squad (I'd call them "well coached" more than anything).
Most of their players didn't score at a very pretty clip: http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/leagues/seasons/teams/0026752013.html
Holding a 2 goal lead against Grand Rapids should be an easier task than holding a 3 goal lead against the Boston Bruins IMO.
Anyway the point stands, Eakins team choked in as bad a way as Carlyle's.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.