• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Hyman Signed

herman said:
Pretty standard practice for buying up UFA years.

Going back to the 14/15 season and looking ahead to all future signed contracts, he's the only non-veteran (under 30) player to have some sort of NTC that I can find with a cap hit below $3mil. This is not standard practice for guys like him.

edit: I meant forward. Karl Alzner had one (a 5-team no trade list) in the 4th year of his 4-year contract that just expired.
 
https://theathletic.com/73678/2017/07/07/mirtle-yes-zach-hyman-is-now-a-core-piece-for-the-maple-leafs/

The m-NTC is a sign of his value to the team, whether that is erroneous or not. It's a weird profile of player to consider core, but if the alternative is considering Komarov or Martin core, then eh. I'd say Hyman is part of the hard outer shell of the core. Not outright expendable, but if another team really wanted what he was offering for a strong offer, we'd let him be on his merry way.

I like Mirtle's comparison of Hyman to Winnik. A younger, faster, probably more offensively skilled, possession-driving glue guy. If he had been revealed earlier, I'm pretty certain we wouldn't have bothered with pursuing Martin.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
Pretty standard practice for buying up UFA years.

Going back to the 14/15 season and looking ahead to all future signed contracts, he's the only non-veteran (under 30) player to have some sort of NTC that I can find with a cap hit below $3mil. This is not standard practice for guys like him.

edit: I meant forward. Karl Alzner had one (a 5-team no trade list) in the 4th year of his 4-year contract that just expired.

You're right. I was thinking of more well compensated players, JvR being the immediate example.
 
herman said:
https://theathletic.com/73678/2017/07/07/mirtle-yes-zach-hyman-is-now-a-core-piece-for-the-maple-leafs/

The m-NTC is a sign of his value to the team, whether that is erroneous or not. It's a weird profile of player to consider core, but if the alternative is considering Komarov or Martin core, then eh. I'd say Hyman is part of the hard outer shell of the core. Not outright expendable, but if another team really wanted what he was offering for a strong offer, we'd let him be on his merry way.

I like Mirtle's comparison of Hyman to Winnik. A younger, faster, probably more offensively skilled, possession-driving glue guy. If he had been revealed earlier, I'm pretty certain we wouldn't have bothered with pursuing Martin.

I'm not so sure about that. Small sample of course, but Hyman and Winnik's career ppg are essentially identical. I also don't think Hyman's emergence -- if you can call it that -- would have had any bearing on signing Martin. Martin was never moving off the 4th line and doesn't see a second of PP or SH time.
 
herman said:
Bullfrog said:
I like Mirtle's comparison of Hyman to Winnik. A younger, faster, probably more offensively skilled, possession-driving glue guy.

I'm not so sure about that. Small sample of course, but Hyman and Winnik's career ppg are essentially identical.

Last season a 31-year old Daniel Winnik put up 25 points in 72 games (0.34 PPG) while playing with Jay Beagle and Tom Wilson. Hyman scored at that exact same pace with Matthews and Nylander/Brown.

Winnik's a UFA and could probably be signed for $1-1.5mil.
 
Bullfrog said:
I'm not so sure about that. Small sample of course, but Hyman and Winnik's career ppg are essentially identical. I also don't think Hyman's emergence -- if you can call it that -- would have had any bearing on signing Martin. Martin was never moving off the 4th line and doesn't see a second of PP or SH time.

Babcock tried Martin out on the PK early on (he's big, and can skate, why not?) and quickly nixed that idea.

As Mirtle (and Jeff Veillette) indicated in their respective articles, we're at the ground floor of Hyman's NHL career. Komarov's contract looked terrible for his numbers initially, but he outperformed his valuation pretty much right away starting at an older age. I'm no scout or whatever, but I see room for growth with the tools at hand and enough runway to actually achieve it.
 
best trade ever? or just a good one, Greg Beer Can McKegg for Zach the Ferrat Hyman. And I mean that with all affection. Zack is a digger and they are good ones despite the stone hands.
 
https://theathletic.com/113938/2017/10/02/mirtle-why-zach-hyman-will-likely-score-more-for-the-leafs-this-season/

Hyman cut his left hand fairly badly on Gallagher's visor during their tussle. Fighting is stupid.

The rest of the article makes the argument that I already made in this thread.

JVR agreed that he and Hyman should have more conversations about [how to position himself to shoot in tight on the goal more successfully].

I maintain that a JvR-Hyman would be nearly the ultimate winger, and if they can both push each other it'd be madness to have two of them*.

* Hyman will never be as good as JvR on offense, and JvR will never be as good as Hyman on the backcheck/forecheck/midcheck/checkers.

---

Is Zach Hyman herman's new Seth Griffith? News a 6.
 
herman said:
https://theathletic.com/113938/2017/10/02/mirtle-why-zach-hyman-will-likely-score-more-for-the-leafs-this-season/

Hyman cut his left hand fairly badly on Gallagher's visor during their tussle. Fighting is stupid.

The rest of the article makes the argument that I already made in this thread.

It's also not exactly Mirtle's best work. The article's got a nice mix of narrative, interviews, and data -- but I think the most likely explanation for the "something weird was going on" is toward the end of the article:

Either there hasn't been a player quite like Hyman in recent league history ? one able to generate a pile of quality chances from in tight but not convert on them ? or he is due for some level of an improvement. How big that bump is remains to be seen.

Has there been a guy without an NHL scorer's hands playing with two superstars for an entire season? Guys like that tend, I'd think, to find their way to the bottom of the lineup -- Hyman hasn't.
 
https://twitter.com/draglikepull/status/914934138230181888

Babcock declared today that Hyman was the best forechecker in the NHL.
Per the tweet above, it's not showing up in the Passing Project data (shot-assists, i.e. passes that lead to shots). This is pretty similar to the tweets a couple of weeks ago about Matthews'/Hyman's Loose Puck Recovery stats (that aren't publicly available).

Having watched most of the games last season, I know why it's not showing up, and I don't have a problem with it.
 
herman said:
Having watched most of the games last season, I know why it's not showing up, and I don't have a problem with it.

Recency bias.

That line ended strong. Matthews-Hyman-Brown/Nylander at even strength was pretty up and down and had a pretty rough stretch between the all-star break and last few weeks of the season.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrCHPDgO5Pc

So... that was something. Seemed familiar.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z-xdP8dLHs
 
Just checking in on my new Seth Griffith:

GPavgTOIGAPtsSH%CF%
YTD2217:08471110.80%52.30%
Pace82152641

hymanza92


Oh look, better shooting percentage when not driving all the way into the crease. I think it'll dip to between 8-9% by the end of the season, and he'll probably get 13 goals if his shooting rate holds steady.

It's still a bit early, but I think we've got a better picture of what Zach Hyman can do. 8 of his 11 pts are primary pts, but even when he's not hitting the scoresheet directly, he is freeing up pucks for his (more skilled) linemates to scoop up, and tying up defensemen.

Last night, he was the victim of circumstance, being pushed from behind so that his stick poked Raanta in the pads, causing Matthews' storybook goal to be disallowed.
 
herman said:
Zee said:
herman said:
There's a chance Hyman's box stats gets a boost from playing against weaker competition if he's lower on the lineup. His 6% sh% is characteristically lower than his career would suggest. He had that explosive senior year with Michigan where he was probably in an overmatch position to succeed and did so.

How do you conclude that 6% SH% is lower than his career would suggest?  He only had 16 other games before last season.  Maybe 6% is what he shoots?  (in 98 career games now he's 7.3%)

He is shooting consistently from high danger areas, and really his only shooting problem was that he was too close at times, due to skating into the pile with his head down. I don't have corsica's numbers available now, but during the year, he was consistently underperforming his xGF.

When he was on the PK, he didn't go as deep, and in transition plays, he showed capable hands. I think he can be better when he's not playing a deferential top line role on his off wing with players that think faster than he does.

https://twitter.com/theflintor/status/946568224702980097
8)
*promptly falls mid-celly
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top