GhostofPotvin29
New member
@renlavoietva
One year deal for Jaromir Jagr with the Devils. Value is between 5 and 6 million dollars depending on bonuses. #tvasports
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@renlavoietva
One year deal for Jaromir Jagr with the Devils. Value is between 5 and 6 million dollars depending on bonuses. #tvasports
L K said:New Jersey probably wasn't going to hit the upper limit of the cap next year so I guess it's not a huge deal but there is no way that he provides good value next year at 5-6 million.
L K said:New Jersey probably wasn't going to hit the upper limit of the cap next year so I guess it's not a huge deal but there is no way that he provides good value next year at 5-6 million.
bustaheims said:I don't know. If he comes anywhere close to what he did for them this season, he'll absolutely provide good value for that money. At some point, his age will finish catching up to him, but, he showed no signs of that this season. The Devils are probably a great fit for him, too. They're not a team that relies on scoring off the rush. They won't have to worry about him not being as fast as skater as he used to be.
drummond said:He gets roughly the same amount as Clarkson... the only difference is that Jagr scored 24 goals and 67 points... while Clarkson 5 goals and 11 points. Why we are debating this???
Nik the Trik said:drummond said:He gets roughly the same amount as Clarkson... the only difference is that Jagr scored 24 goals and 67 points... while Clarkson 5 goals and 11 points. Why we are debating this???
Were we?
drummond said:Well, I got a sense that there are some posters (see above) doubting whether Jagr provides good value at 5-6 mil. I just find it odd, if the Leafs pay more or less the same amount for a player who provides considerably less.
Nik the Trik said:drummond said:Well, I got a sense that there are some posters (see above) doubting whether Jagr provides good value at 5-6 mil. I just find it odd, if the Leafs pay more or less the same amount for a player who provides considerably less.
Well that's a little bit like the people who responded to any criticism of Burke with saying "But he's better than JFJ". Nobody is arguing that the Leafs got good value out of Clarkson and he's not the benchmark for what is or isn't good value at his price point. I don't know what good value is at 5-6 million in an empirical sense but I think Clarkson was bad enough that you can be better than him and still not be a 5 million dollar player.
drummond said:I get it, but if Jagr led his team in scoring, finished 27th in scoring league wide, did not miss a game, what else would you want for 5-6 mil.
Nik the Trik said:drummond said:I get it, but if Jagr led his team in scoring, finished 27th in scoring league wide, did not miss a game, what else would you want for 5-6 mil.
Except they're not paying him for last year, they're paying him for what they think he'll do next year and the guy is 42 years old. Obviously an incentive laden deal has some protections and like I said I wouldn't bet against him at this point but questioning whether or not he can continue to produce at that pace is valid.
drummond said:He is actually getting better the older he is since his comeback, which is compelling argument regardless of his age.
2011/12 73GP 54PTS .74PPG (39 years)
2012/13 45GP 35PTS .78PPG (40 years)
2013/14 82GP 67PTS .82PPG (41 years)
pmrules said:Wait a minute - since when can a veteran like Jagr get an "incentive" based deal? I thought those were limited to ELC's?
drummond said:Nik the Trik said:drummond said:He gets roughly the same amount as Clarkson... the only difference is that Jagr scored 24 goals and 67 points... while Clarkson 5 goals and 11 points. Why we are debating this???
Were we?
Well, I got a sense that there are some posters (see above) doubting whether Jagr provides good value at 5-6 mil. I just find it odd, if the Leafs pay more or less the same amount for a player who provides considerably less.
pmrules said:Wait a minute - since when can a veteran like Jagr get an "incentive" based deal? I thought those were limited to ELC's?