ZBBM
Well-known member
I was off-grid when it happened and only learned of it today from a story in the NY Times. It is infuriating.
The commenters on the Times story got into a back and forth over the paper's referring to it as an "accident." Which it was, insofar as the driver didn't intend to hit and kill them. However, once you intentionally decide (a) to have "5 or 6 beers" and then intentionally decide (b) to drive, I would submit that you have flipped "intention" on its head. Through those two intentional decisions, you have forfeited the possibility that any damage you cause while driving is "accidental," both in a plain-language sense and (obviously) in a legally culpable sense. "Accidental" in its plain-language sense means a random occurrence ? all other things being equal. When you drive drunk, all other things no longer are equal.
When he's convicted, as I'm sure he will be (if he doesn't plead guilty) he'll be sentenced according to whatever guidelines are in place in NJ. Much as we might like to ramp up the sentence based on personal factors (how beloved the victims were, their hockey talent), that won't make any difference. Not good for our desire for vengeance, but good for the overall justice system.
The commenters on the Times story got into a back and forth over the paper's referring to it as an "accident." Which it was, insofar as the driver didn't intend to hit and kill them. However, once you intentionally decide (a) to have "5 or 6 beers" and then intentionally decide (b) to drive, I would submit that you have flipped "intention" on its head. Through those two intentional decisions, you have forfeited the possibility that any damage you cause while driving is "accidental," both in a plain-language sense and (obviously) in a legally culpable sense. "Accidental" in its plain-language sense means a random occurrence ? all other things being equal. When you drive drunk, all other things no longer are equal.
When he's convicted, as I'm sure he will be (if he doesn't plead guilty) he'll be sentenced according to whatever guidelines are in place in NJ. Much as we might like to ramp up the sentence based on personal factors (how beloved the victims were, their hockey talent), that won't make any difference. Not good for our desire for vengeance, but good for the overall justice system.