• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Jonathan Drouin requests trade

So in the last few years the following Tampa players have either asked for trades or are rumoured to want out:

Martin St. Louis
Steve Stamkos
Jonathan Drouin

Something's up there.
 
Wow, I like stevie Y, and I wouldn't blame him in the least for not extending Stamkos at the cap hit he wants, but clearly there's something dysfunctional down there.
 
I read some rumbling that he has a bit of an attitude problem.  That being said, I'm pretty perplexed by the way Tampa has handled his development.
 
I think this shows some of the pitfalls in a super talented prospect getting drafted to a pretty good team. I think what happens is they expect young players to fit into the roles that they have available and expect them to do that with a degree of veteran proficiency rather than letting them figure out their game at their own pace. Then, when they struggle with it, you start hearing about "attitude problems".
 
CarltonTheBear said:
So in the last few years the following Tampa players have either asked for trades or are rumoured to want out:

Martin St. Louis
Steve Stamkos
Jonathan Drouin

Something's up there.

It's tough to connect any dots though. If St. Louis wanted out because of the Olympic snub, Stamkos wants to cash-in as a UFA and Drouin....well, I'm assuming Drouin just wants to play more. You can argue that maybe they should be developing Drouin better but outside of that I don't know if it speaks to anything in particular.
 
Nik the Trik said:
I think this shows some of the pitfalls in a super talented prospect getting drafted to a pretty good team. I think what happens is they expect young players to fit into the roles that they have available and expect them to do that with a degree of veteran proficiency rather than letting them figure out their game at their own pace. Then, when they struggle with it, you start hearing about "attitude problems".

It could be that a third overall pick wants more ice-time, and given all the talent on that team, he doesn't get it...and that makes him angry. 

Regardless, at 20 years old with a total of 6 NHL goals, publicly requesting a trade probably lends more to LK's reported rumours. 
 
Frank E said:
Nik the Trik said:
I think this shows some of the pitfalls in a super talented prospect getting drafted to a pretty good team. I think what happens is they expect young players to fit into the roles that they have available and expect them to do that with a degree of veteran proficiency rather than letting them figure out their game at their own pace. Then, when they struggle with it, you start hearing about "attitude problems".

It could be that a third overall pick wants more ice-time, and given all the talent on that team, he doesn't get it...and that makes him angry. 

Regardless, at 20 years old with a total of 6 NHL goals, publicly requesting a trade probably lends more to LK's reported rumours.

Some of it ties more in to how he would act in Major Junior.
 
Nik the Trik said:
It's tough to connect any dots though. If St. Louis wanted out because of the Olympic snub, Stamkos wants to cash-in as a UFA and Drouin....well, I'm assuming Drouin just wants to play more. You can argue that maybe they should be developing Drouin better but outside of that I don't know if it speaks to anything in particular.

Well I'd say that there's a common theme of Tampa not treating it's star (or future star) players how they want to be treated.
 
Frank E said:
It could be that a third overall pick wants more ice-time, and given all the talent on that team, he doesn't get it...and that makes him angry.

But that's my point. Usually players like him aren't drafted onto teams with a lot of talent and get to sort of naturally grow into 1st and 2nd line roles. In situations like this one they probably need their 1st and 2nd liners to be more complete players if they want to have the season they probably aimed for. So that creates an understandable clash.

And, as we've seen in recent years in Boston, when teams run into these sorts of issues with young players "attitude problems" seems like a convenient shorthand for teams who don't know how to manage the issue.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Well I'd say that there's a common theme of Tampa not treating it's star (or future star) players how they want to be treated.

Sure but if "how they want to be treated" involves writing them a blank check or handing out Olympic roster spots on the basis of pacification then I guess I'd say it doesn't seem to present a theme of them doing anything wrong.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Sure but if "how they want to be treated" involves writing them a blank check or handing out Olympic roster spots on the basis of pacification then I guess I'd say it doesn't seem to present a theme of them doing anything wrong.

Well that's assuming that Stamkos' only issue with Tampa right now is money. And all the speculation out there right now says that it isn't. If anything the major sticking point in the media has been about the coach.

As for St. Louis' snub, yeah I would say that a player thinking the GM of his own team thinking that his GM snubbed him like that would fall into that category.
 
Babs sums up my reaction to this.

https://gfycat.com/FickleOpulentHapuka

Unfortunately the Leafs aren't likely in a spot to give up the kind of assets Tampa would be looking for in return.

Unless they're interested in an air tight pinky promise that the Leafs won't go after Stamkos.  8)
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Well that's assuming that Stamkos' only issue with Tampa right now is money. And all the speculation out there right now says that it isn't. If anything the major sticking point in the media has been about the coach.

You know I hate being overly technical but the use of the conjunction "if" renders any following statement conditional. It's a supposition, not an assumption. 

CarltonTheBear said:
As for St. Louis' snub, yeah I would say that a player thinking the GM of his own team thinking that his GM snubbed him like that would fall into that category.

You lost me here.
 
Nik the Trik said:
CarltonTheBear said:
As for St. Louis' snub, yeah I would say that a player thinking the GM of his own team thinking that his GM snubbed him like that would fall into that category.

You lost me here.

Yeah, sorry, I had 2 different sentences in my head going at the same time there. St. Louis thought he should have been on Team Canada. St. Louis thought his own GM would have felt the same way. St. Louis was upset with how his GM treated him in snubbing him.

After that two other star or future star players clashed with a coach that the same GM committed to. That clash will likely lead to both of those players leaving the team.
 
Potvin29 said:
The Turris trade and perhaps the Niedereiter trade are possible comparables.

Niedereiter was traded for Cal Clutterbuck and a 3rd rounder. At the time I remember most people thinking that the Islanders lost that trade. Kyle Turris was traded for David Rundblad and a 2nd rounder. Rundblad was 2 years away from being a mid-1st rounder. I think the consensus was that was a pretty even trade.

Kapanen and a 2nd could be a decent comparable to that. Although if the Leafs decide to consider trading JVR that would probably do it.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Yeah, sorry, I had 2 different sentences in my head going at the same time there. St. Louis thought he should have been on Team Canada. St. Louis thought his own GM would have felt the same way. St. Louis was upset with how his GM treated him in snubbing him.

Right. I think we'd agree that those are the nuts and bolts of what happened. In order, though, to make the argument that what Yzerman did was wrong there I think you'd need to believe one of the following:

[list type=decimal]
1. Yzerman thought St. Louis did deserve to be on Team Canada but didn't select him just to antagonize him.
2. Yzerman was simply wrong about St. Louis not being deserving of the selection
3. Yzerman, regardless of his responsibilities to Hockey Canada should have chosen St. Louis whether he was worthy or not to placate him.
4. Yzerman should have done a better job in communicating his decision to St. Louis.
[/list]

The only one I think is particularly credible is #4 and even then it's tough to criticize how Yzerman communicated his decision without knowing how he did. I don't know if I can make the leap from "St. Louis was upset" straight to "So therefore Yzerman messed up". St. Louis might just be being a jerk.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top