Leafs @ Sabres - Mar. 31st, 7:00pm - TSN4, Fan 590

[bustaheims]

Ferraro saying he can't believe that isn't a goal but it was in the net... the ref announced incidental contact... I'm confused.

No. He's confused. The TSN crew clearly did not listen to the ref at all. I mean, they're going on and on about the puck being in the net, when that's completely irrelevant to why it was no goal.

 

[dappleganger]

I don't think Ray gets it.

 

[McGarnagle]

Wow, I think we've seen a lot more contact than that and the goal counting...

 

[ZBBM]

Ferraro saying he can't believe that isn't a goal but it was in the net... the ref announced incidental contact... I'm confused.

No. He's confused. The TSN crew clearly did not listen to the ref at all. I mean, they're going on and on about the puck being in the net, when that's completely irrelevant to why it was no goal.

Ferraro's kind of loopy, truth be told.

 

[dappleganger]

Ray finally gets it.

 

[herman]

Either way, this is another great showing from our top AHL defensemen.

 

[bustaheims]

Ferraro saying he can't believe that isn't a goal but it was in the net... the ref announced incidental contact... I'm confused.

No. He's confused. The TSN crew clearly did not listen to the ref at all. I mean, they're going on and on about the puck being in the net, when that's completely irrelevant to why it was no goal.

Ferraro's kind of loopy, truth be told.

Wasn't just Ferraro, though. It was both of them who had no clue what the ref clearly announced to the crowd.

 

[CarltonTheBear]

Wait, coaches can challenge no-call calls too?

 

[herman]

What a great rush by Kadri and co.

 

[bustaheims]

Wait, coaches can challenge no-call calls too?

Yeah. That was weird. I mean, I can understand challenging whether or not the puck went into the net in a situation where it wasn't reviewed, but interference?

 

[Al14]

Kadri getting blamed for a goal that Sparks should have definitely saved and that Rielly did little-to-nothing to defend against.

Sparks and Rielly... in tank mode, Kadri?... in lazy ass mode! 

 

[CarltonTheBear]

Yeah. That was weird. I mean, I can understand challenging whether or not the puck went into the net in a situation where it wasn't reviewed, but interference?

And those "was the puck in the net" situations are automatically reviewed, so if they don't see it on the first automatic review it'd be a pretty useless move to challenge it.

 

[McGarnagle]

C.O'Reilly/R.O'Reilly
J.Benn/J.Benn
H.Sedin/D.Sedin
M.Stall/E.Stall

That's pretty remarkable. The leafs will be in good company when they have two nylanders.

 

[CarltonTheBear]

"If you show numbers, sooner or later somebody is going to illegally check you from behind"

What a league we have.

 

[ZBBM]

Ferraro saying he can't believe that isn't a goal but it was in the net... the ref announced incidental contact... I'm confused.

No. He's confused. The TSN crew clearly did not listen to the ref at all. I mean, they're going on and on about the puck being in the net, when that's completely irrelevant to why it was no goal.

Ferraro's kind of loopy, truth be told.

Wasn't just Ferraro, though. It was both of them who had no clue what the ref clearly announced to the crowd.

Yes, but Cuthbert is usually on the ball.  Ray gets into a rut sometimes and can't get out.

 

[ZBBM]

I'm with you there.  Do they have to use every number between 37 and 49 at the same time?

"Er-ah, this Sun Tzu fellah's got a lot of good thoughts about hockey."

I just want Nylander to be able to wear 62 again.

 

[herman]

In case you missed it:

[tweet]715703478073565186[/tweet]

 

[ZBBM]

Nylander's striped shorts are epic, and so is the kid doing the backwards V.

 

[herman]

Nylander's striped shorts are epic, and so is the kid doing the backwards V.

In his heart he always knew that he would a) have flo b) wear the blue and white.

 

[Heroic Shrimp]

In case you missed it:

[tweet]715703478073565186[/tweet]

Gee, which one is Nylander...?