bustaheims
Active member
herman said:What's the point of keeping the nominally better player that the coach you're committed to will not play over said coach's second-favourite worker bee who has situational application, particularly defensively? If it was still a Martin > Leivo situation like last year, I'd be more contentious about it. Brown has better AHL numbers and is younger than Leivo so it's not unjustifiable.
I don't think it's a big deal, either, as neither player moves the needle significantly more than the other, but, Babcock is still the primary reason Leivo was moved over Brown. Keeping Leivo over Brown would have been preferable for cap reasons, but, other than that? Meh.