You know, I'm starting to think the Lighting aren't exactly "very beatable".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CarltonTheBear said:You know, I'm starting to think the Lighting aren't exactly "very beatable".
CarltonTheBear said:You know, I'm starting to think the Lighting aren't exactly "very beatable".
RedLeaf said:I think Leafs just need a ?slightly? more favourable first round match up to go on a run next year.
We're literally watching a dynasty in the Lightning, but sure. Steamroll.4EVRLEAFAN said:RedLeaf said:I think Leafs just need a ?slightly? more favourable first round match up to go on a run next year.
Sucks doesn't it. We have to hope for a weaker opponent to advance. With the talent on this team we should be steamrolling everyone.
4EVRLEAFAN said:RedLeaf said:I think Leafs just need a ?slightly? more favourable first round match up to go on a run next year.
Sucks doesn't it. We have to hope for a weaker opponent to advance. With the talent on this team we should be steamrolling everyone.
Nik said:And it seems pretty contradictory to say in one post that the Leafs have to hope for a weaker opponent to advance and then say the Lightning were 100% beatable. They were beatable. The Leafs are good enough to beat them. They just didn't.
bustaheims said:The Leafs went toe-to-toe with the Lightning, pushed them to brink, and gave them everything they could handle until the buzzer rang to end game 7. They got beat. The did not choke. Plain and simple.
Nik said:Don't worry guys. We just need to be more like the Lightning. We just have to figure out a way to get all of our top tier players to sign their contracts for way below market value because of advantageous local tax laws and nice boating weather.
Remember how much it sucked when players signed with teams just because they offered the most money? Glad that's fixed.
Significantly Insignificant said:I know that your post is meant in half jest, but on a serious side, do you think an after tax cap would be the way to go here? Based on past posts, no cap at all would be your desired approach, but I think that if they are going to move forward with the cap, then there are some tweaks that they need to make to level the playing field a bit, which is what they said the cap was supposed to do.