• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

R1, G2: Lightning @ Leafs - May 4th, 7:30pm - CBC, CityNews 680

We can win this series, we just have to stay outta the box. Tampa powerplay is clicking. Ours, not so much.
 
Bender said:
Nik said:
Deebo said:
Nik said:
tomcom said:
L K said:
Down 2 and they spent way too much time trying to be cute on the PP

They have been like that all season. So predictable and Rielly still refuse to shoot.

It was the #1 PP in the league.

It was the 15h highest PP% of all time and 4th in the last 30 years.

I was going to say that other than the McDavid Oilers it was the most successful PP any team has had in three years but yours is better.

But yeah. Bad all year.
Leafs lose a game and you'd think they were picking first overall in the draft.
[/quote
Not at all ?the script remains the same, is I think what is being expressed, which is a completely justified view until they show differently.
 
Derk said:
azzurri63 said:
Derk said:
Okay, nice for the leafs to finally get a pp but I'm sorry, the refs have been terrible.

I've said this before but I'll say it again for those new or didn't see it. I live out west and one of my golfing buddies doesn't watch hockey anymore. His take since Bettman became full fledged commissioner for a full season no Canadian team has won Lord Stanley. Coincidence?

No. Five different Canadian teams have made it to the finals since Montreal last won the cup. I think it is just that the league has started to catch up.

No I said no Canadian team has won the cup.
 
I like it when the refs are clearly thinking, hey we get paid more if the series goes the distance.
 
tomcom said:
They are #1 because they have the best shooter in the entire league.

The Leafs PP this year was 7.2% more effective than St. Louis' was the year Brett Hull scored 86 goals. It was 3.1% more effective than Pittsburgh had the year Mario Lemieux scored 85.  It was 1.7% more effective than the Oilers the year Gretzky scored the most goals anyone has ever scored during a NHL season. It was more effective than any PP the Caps have had during Ovechkin's entire career.
 
BermudaBudsFan said:
Bender said:
Nik said:
Deebo said:
Nik said:
tomcom said:
L K said:
Down 2 and they spent way too much time trying to be cute on the PP

They have been like that all season. So predictable and Rielly still refuse to shoot.

It was the #1 PP in the league.

It was the 15h highest PP% of all time and 4th in the last 30 years.

I was going to say that other than the McDavid Oilers it was the most successful PP any team has had in three years but yours is better.

But yeah. Bad all year.
Leafs lose a game and you'd think they were picking first overall in the draft.
[/quote
Not at all ?the script remains the same, is I think what is being expressed, which is a completely justified view until they show differently.



I agree with this fundamental premise, but let's make reasonable arguments in defense of it.  The fact is that this is going to be a tough series for the Leafs (or any other team) to win, and if they don't, the question is what changes should be made.
 
Nik said:
tomcom said:
They are #1 because they have the best shooter in the entire league.

The Leafs PP this year was 7.2% more effective than St. Louis' was the year Brett Hull scored 86 goals. It was 3.1% more effective than Pittsburgh had the year Mario Lemieux scored 85.  It was 1.7% more effective than the Oilers the year Gretzky scored the most goals anyone has ever scored during a NHL season. It was more effective than any PP the Caps have had during Ovechkin's entire career.

I choose to take from this that you feel Matthews is a better shooter than Gretzky, Lemieux, Hull and Ovechkin combined.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
BermudaBudsFan said:
Bender said:
Nik said:
Deebo said:
Nik said:
tomcom said:
L K said:
Down 2 and they spent way too much time trying to be cute on the PP

They have been like that all season. So predictable and Rielly still refuse to shoot.

It was the #1 PP in the league.

It was the 15h highest PP% of all time and 4th in the last 30 years.

I was going to say that other than the McDavid Oilers it was the most successful PP any team has had in three years but yours is better.

But yeah. Bad all year.
Leafs lose a game and you'd think they were picking first overall in the draft.
[/quote
Not at all ?the script remains the same, is I think what is being expressed, which is a completely justified view until they show differently.



I agree with this fundamental premise, but let's make reasonable arguments in defense of it.  The fact is that this is going to be a tough series for the Leafs (or any other team) to win, and if they don't, the question is what changes should be made.
Absolutely they need to prove it, but I'm cheering until the bitter end of their run, and quite frankly the talk of the narrative still being the same in a 1-1 series is so goddamn irritating, especially when they're nowhere to be found during literally the best regular season in franchise history and only come out to shit on the team after a playoff loss.
 
Kucherov and Stamkos both didn't get a single shot attempt while up against Matthews/Marner at 5-on-5. Tavares, even though he isn't producing enough offence, also did a very good job neutralizing them at 5-on-5. Cut the dumb penalties down and this series is still in Toronto's favour.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Kucherov and Stamkos both didn't get a single shot attempt while up against Matthews/Marner at 5-on-5. Tavares, even though he isn't producing enough offence, also did a very good job neutralizing them at 5-on-5. Cut the dumb penalties down and this series is still in Toronto's favour.

Good observations.  If Matthews were as invisible as Stamkos the first two games the Hot Takes Leafs Fanbase would be screaming so loud it would knock Earth off its tilt.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Kucherov and Stamkos both didn't get a single shot attempt while up against Matthews/Marner at 5-on-5. Tavares, even though he isn't producing enough offence, also did a very good job neutralizing them at 5-on-5. Cut the dumb penalties down and this series is still in Toronto's favour.

I think we need more from Tavares though.  We need more from Nylander too but the thing about Tavares is I'm not really seeing much of anything one way or the other.  The 4th line was really bad last night but was it just me or did I see them have more than a handful of shifts against the Kucherov line.
 
L K said:
I think we need more from Tavares though.  We need more from Nylander too but the thing about Tavares is I'm not really seeing much of anything one way or the other.

Obviously Tavares is getting paid enough money to be more than just a shutdown C but if he's able to neutralize the Stamkos/Kucherov line in Tampa then even if he doesn't really provide much offence that's putting us in a very good position to win those games.

L K said:
The 4th line was really bad last night but was it just me or did I see them have more than a handful of shifts against the Kucherov line.

Kucherov played about a minute against both Blackwell and Simmonds. Stamkos had about a minute against Blackwell but just 4 seconds against Simmonds. So not much there.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
L K said:
I think we need more from Tavares though.  We need more from Nylander too but the thing about Tavares is I'm not really seeing much of anything one way or the other.

Obviously Tavares is getting paid enough money to be more than just a shutdown C but if he's able to neutralize the Stamkos/Kucherov line in Tampa then even if he doesn't really provide much offence that's putting us in a very good position to win those games.

L K said:
The 4th line was really bad last night but was it just me or did I see them have more than a handful of shifts against the Kucherov line.

Kucherov played about a minute against both Blackwell and Simmonds. Stamkos had about a minute against Blackwell but just 4 seconds against Simmonds. So not much there.

Ok so it was just a notable shift then.  Thanks.

In defence of Nylander he is tied for 2nd on the team in shots so hopefully he can start putting them behind Vasilevskiy
 
L K said:
CarltonTheBear said:
L K said:
I think we need more from Tavares though.  We need more from Nylander too but the thing about Tavares is I'm not really seeing much of anything one way or the other.

Obviously Tavares is getting paid enough money to be more than just a shutdown C but if he's able to neutralize the Stamkos/Kucherov line in Tampa then even if he doesn't really provide much offence that's putting us in a very good position to win those games.

L K said:
The 4th line was really bad last night but was it just me or did I see them have more than a handful of shifts against the Kucherov line.

Kucherov played about a minute against both Blackwell and Simmonds. Stamkos had about a minute against Blackwell but just 4 seconds against Simmonds. So not much there.

Ok so it was just a notable shift then.  Thanks.

In defence of Nylander he is tied for 2nd on the team in shots so hopefully he can start putting them behind Vasilevskiy

8 have ended up there already.  He's not invincible.  The hair-trigger pessimism from some (not you) is not justified.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
8 have ended up there already.  He's not invincible.  The hair-trigger pessimism from some (not you) is not justified.

He made some very timely saves last night, but, overall, he has looked beatable.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Kucherov and Stamkos both didn't get a single shot attempt while up against Matthews/Marner at 5-on-5. Tavares, even though he isn't producing enough offence, also did a very good job neutralizing them at 5-on-5. Cut the dumb penalties down and this series is still in Toronto's favour.
Agree. Have to stop the dumb penalties. I think JT is playing fine, just not on the offensive side yet. It's only the 2nd game. We need M&M to keep going and Willy and JT need to get it going.
 
Guilt Trip said:
CarltonTheBear said:
Kucherov and Stamkos both didn't get a single shot attempt while up against Matthews/Marner at 5-on-5. Tavares, even though he isn't producing enough offence, also did a very good job neutralizing them at 5-on-5. Cut the dumb penalties down and this series is still in Toronto's favour.
Agree. Have to stop the dumb penalties. I think JT is playing fine, just not on the offensive side yet. It's only the 2nd game. We need M&M to keep going and Willy and JT need to get it going.

Playoffs are such a huge flashpoint for so many fans that everything gets magnified.  He doesn't score for 2 games, total bum.  If he manages to score a game winner in OT or something, hero for the ages.  And so it goes
 
bustaheims said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
8 have ended up there already.  He's not invincible.  The hair-trigger pessimism from some (not you) is not justified.

He made some very timely saves last night, but, overall, he has looked beatable.

It's more hypothetical worry, but I guess the fear is always going to be that he suddenly becomes that unbeatable monster. 

We outscored Tampa 8-5.  Tampa had 12 power plays to our 10 (27 minutes to 20 minutes).

Our PP hasn't been successful (1/10) but has had some really good chances. 
Our PK wasn't good last night but ultimately is only at -1 in +/- which is pretty insane against a team as good as Tampa.

If there is anything to maybe be a bit more leery its that the PP also kind of scuffled down the stretch in April (17.7% vs. 27.3% on the season).  The Leafs need to find a way to capitalize on their chances.

They played a really good 19:50 of the first period.  They didn't have a very good middle 30 minutes and were fine the last 10.  So ultimately I think they have been the better team for 4.5 out of the 6 periods so far.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top