Nik the Trik said:
Significantly Insignificant said:
Not from Rob Rossi. The problem I have is that these champions for justice only show up when it happens to their player. At some point a step back needs to be taken. If it happens to your team and you don't like it, then it isn't good if it happens to the other team either. As fans we can't have it both ways. If what happened last night is a suspendable offense, then so were the acts that Crosby committed in the last couple of weeks of the season.
That seems like a pretty strange and false equivalency. Crosby hitting Methot in the hand was gory but it was the result of the sort of stick work that virtually every player in the league does that just happened to go wrong. The issue with the hit on Crosby was whether or not you think they deliberately targeted his head. I don't think for the sake of consistency we have to think that the alleged acts are the same thing even if we don't think Niskanen was particularly guilty.
If you wanted to suspend Crosby for the shot between the legs I think that would have been fair but even then I don't think ideological consistency demands we regard headshots and shots to the old John Thomas as being the same thing.
Sure, they may not be equivalent as far as the severity of what they did. The Rossi article has a tone though that what happened to Crosby was deliberate and predatory, and that's why it should be suspendable. If predatory behavior is suspendable, then deliberately skating over to a guy and spearing him the cockles and muscles is also one of those offences. I have also seen articles that say that you can't defend what happened to Crosby. This is all true.
I may not be making my point very well here, but my feeling is that you can't get on your soap box, and talk about how dirty the Capitals are, and how they planned to take Crosby out of the game, and how this is the sort of predatory behavior that needs to be removed, when we have incidents where Crosby has exhibited that same behavior and the soap box stayed in the closet.
For the most part I wonder why the DOPS gets these cases wrong on such a consistent basis. Is it because the league is paralyzed by perception? Is it the pending legal problems with concussions? Is it the potential fan outrage? None of these are valid reasons to justify putting a players safety in jeopardy. Perhaps if fans and media were more consistent in their views on player safety, the NHL would get better at it.
Ultimately, as a fan, I want Crosby in as many games as possible. If the league, for consistencies sake, has to suspend him for a game, but that suspension is going to help protect him from getting a concussion later, then I say the league does it. The NHL has in the past managed to get rid of dangerous aspects of the game such as bench clearing brawls, and frequent knee on knee hits. I know that knee on knee hits still happen, but not with the frequency that they did in the past. I think we still see in todays game a lot of elbows to the head, and a lot of stick slashes on the wrists. Stiffer penalties may help remove them.