ZBBM
Active member
CarltonTheBear said:
It's April 3rd and Todd McLellan is still trying to establish a "work ethic" for his team. Babcock did that in a weekend in September.
The conclusion I draw us that it wasn't Eakins who was at fault.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CarltonTheBear said:
It's April 3rd and Todd McLellan is still trying to establish a "work ethic" for his team. Babcock did that in a weekend in September.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:CarltonTheBear said:
It's April 3rd and Todd McLellan is still trying to establish a "work ethic" for his team. Babcock did that in a weekend in September.
The conclusion I draw us that it wasn't Eakins who was at fault.
CarltonTheBear said:Gonna be a fun offseason. I think the Oilers are gonna do something stupid. If the Bruins miss they'll do something stupid too.
I really wonder what we'd have to add to get Edmonton to say yes to a Hall for JVR+ trade.
Bullfrog said:Joe S. said:It doesn't matter where the leafs finish. They're not getting that pick.
It drives me nuts listening to talking heads in the radio saying 'leafs can't even lose right' last I checked this team was still dead last in row... It's not like they had this magical turnaround and are on a blazing winning streak. It's the other teams that drove their trucks off the cliff.
Drives me nuts when people say stuff like that. It's a simple mathematical probability. That may get the pick, they may not.
CarltonTheBear said:Gonna be a fun offseason. I think the Oilers are gonna do something stupid. If the Bruins miss they'll do something stupid too.
I really wonder what we'd have to add to get Edmonton to say yes to a Hall for JVR+ trade.
Joe S. said:Bullfrog said:Joe S. said:It doesn't matter where the leafs finish. They're not getting that pick.
It drives me nuts listening to talking heads in the radio saying 'leafs can't even lose right' last I checked this team was still dead last in row... It's not like they had this magical turnaround and are on a blazing winning streak. It's the other teams that drove their trucks off the cliff.
Drives me nuts when people say stuff like that. It's a simple mathematical probability. That may get the pick, they may not.
I know statistically they have a shot at the pick. My non mathematical gut is telling me they won't get it.
Nik the Trik said:I think that if(and I agree it might should be "when" at this point) Edmonton makes a move with one of their big pieces A) it'll be RNH or Eberle rather than Hall and B) They'll have to get defense back.
McGarnagle said:I could so see Chiarelli throwing an insane FA contract offer out for Lucic.
Nik the Trik said:I think that if(and I agree it might should be "when" at this point) Edmonton makes a move with one of their big pieces A) it'll be RNH or Eberle rather than Hall and B) They'll have to get defense back.
I can't see the Oilers doing that...if Mathews turns out to be a star,they would have egg on their face for years to come,similar to the trades that past Leaf GM's have made.RedLeaf said:Its funny, but wasn't there a time not long ago when fans were proposing trading some of our 'D' for some of their offence? I don't think there is (or probably never was) a deal that would make sense for both sides. On top of that we need more 'D' ourselves now. Would a Gardiner or Reilly for Matthews (should they win the lottery) make sense to anyone?
Joe S. said:Bullfrog said:Joe S. said:It doesn't matter where the leafs finish. They're not getting that pick.
It drives me nuts listening to talking heads in the radio saying 'leafs can't even lose right' last I checked this team was still dead last in row... It's not like they had this magical turnaround and are on a blazing winning streak. It's the other teams that drove their trucks off the cliff.
Drives me nuts when people say stuff like that. It's a simple mathematical probability. That may get the pick, they may not.
I know statistically they have a shot at the pick. My non mathematical gut is telling me they won't get it.
lamajama said:Bullfrog said:Joe S. said:It doesn't matter where the leafs finish. They're not getting that pick.
It drives me nuts listening to talking heads in the radio saying 'leafs can't even lose right' last I checked this team was still dead last in row... It's not like they had this magical turnaround and are on a blazing winning streak. It's the other teams that drove their trucks off the cliff.
Drives me nuts when people say stuff like that. It's a simple mathematical probability. That may get the pick, they may not.
That's because you still harbor a belief that, given any statistical opportunity the Leafs have to "win", that the Leafs could
indeed "win" such an opportunity.
jdh1 said:I can't see the Oilers doing that...if Mathews turns out to be a star,they would have egg on their face for years to come,similar to the trades that past Leaf GM's have made.RedLeaf said:Its funny, but wasn't there a time not long ago when fans were proposing trading some of our 'D' for some of their offence? I don't think there is (or probably never was) a deal that would make sense for both sides. On top of that we need more 'D' ourselves now. Would a Gardiner or Reilly for Matthews (should they win the lottery) make sense to anyone?
CarltonTheBear said:Gonna be a fun offseason. I think the Oilers are gonna do something stupid. If the Bruins miss they'll do something stupid too.