Kin
New member
TML fan said:Actually Nik, it IS a concrete term under most use of force models. There are guidelines when this type of force can be applied and failure to adhere to those guidelines can have serious legal consequences.
You're confusing the concept of a specific definition under certain guidelines with a concrete fact. Anything could be referred to as a compliance tool if its purpose could be compliance. That Pepper Spray is defined as such by certain groups doesn't give the term any more weight.
TML fan said:Potvin or anyone else is certainly entitled to their opinion. I believe in the rule of law and that society cannot function without it. I believe that, even in a free society, that people cannot just do anything they want without consequences. I was explaining the legal standpoint to him and he attacked my beliefs. If he wants to discuss things that way I can do the same.
If you're inclined to climb down off the cross for a second, Potvin "attacked" you by sarcastically dismissing your argumentum ad verecundiam. It's pretty clear that by saying it was "messed up" Potvin wasn't saying it violated some sort of specific law or regulation.
Saying that everyone's entitled to their opinion directly contradicts the idea, espoused by you, that the only question here as to justification is a legal one. You directly said that ethical or moral questions over this behaviour is an inappropriate question. But in a free society those are valid questions regardless of what the law says.