Jonathan Willis @JonathanWillis
Dion Phaneuf in 2015-16:
w/ Jake Gardiner: 50% GF, 53.2% Corsi
w/ anyone else: 28.6% GF, 47.4% Corsi
If Phaneuf does bring back some sort of value Lou owes Jake a gift basket.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jonathan Willis @JonathanWillis
Dion Phaneuf in 2015-16:
w/ Jake Gardiner: 50% GF, 53.2% Corsi
w/ anyone else: 28.6% GF, 47.4% Corsi
Patrick said:Alright, excel spreadsheet time ya dorks.
Who has the cap space, playoff race need and willingness to eat the remainder of his contract?
Potvin29 said:Patrick said:Alright, excel spreadsheet time ya dorks.
Who has the cap space, playoff race need and willingness to eat the remainder of his contract?
Okay I did one and it determined that Byron Froese isn't that good.
Patrick said:Alright, excel spreadsheet time ya dorks.
Who has the cap space, playoff race need and willingness to eat the remainder of his contract?
CarltonTheBear said:Patrick said:Alright, excel spreadsheet time ya dorks.
Who has the cap space, playoff race need and willingness to eat the remainder of his contract?
Detroit and Dallas were two teams he's been linked to in the past year. The Wings bought out Stephen Weiss though so they don't have any long-terms they regret right now. That'll make things tough unless the Leafs eat salary.
The Stars certainly aren't afraid to make big moves. Lehtonen is on the books for 2 more seasons after this one at $5.9mil and their 1a/1b system has become more of a traditional model with Niemi getting the majority of the starts. Maybe something like Phaneuf and Reimer for Lehtonen + something? They can still have their 2-goalie system and they can try to re-sign Reimer to a more reasonable deal than Kari's.
edit: I mean, nevermind.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:A whole bunch of us doubted he would get traded in this thread....
louisstamos said:30 minutes before he was traded.
hobarth said:x.jr.benchwarmer said:hobarth said:x.jr.benchwarmer said:CarltonTheBear said:I don't think Phaneuf becomes a must-move until after Nylander and Marner's ELCs are up. I also think that'll be around when other teams start to feel comfortable taking the rest of his contract (assuming he can maintain a level of play similar to what we've seen this season).
Certainly the term "must-move" is a subjective one, depending on the necessity of getting rid of his contract or his mistakes (again the idiotic pinch in the first minute of the game against Ottawa), etc.
By all accounts, he seems to be a classy guy, who is good to the young players.
But, really, is he going to be any better in 2 or 3 or 4 years from now? Can the Leafs expect to get anything at all in the future for him, especially if his skating inevitably declines because of age, talent, etc. etc.?
I suggest that it certainly is incumbent on the GM to explore options including trying to trade him now, instead of, say, focusing on seat eligibility for the team's charters, and to ensure that the employees can no longer talk to the media.
So are you saying that teams shouldn't be signing players of 27, 28 years old to long term contracts because performance declines are inevitable?
Yes you are correct (Mr. Noonis).
Are you saying TO should only keep players until they're 25 or 26 or 27 then let them walk or trade them?