Kin
New member
Rob L said:Well, okay but outside of tasty treats, I'm not sure there's much of a case for Horton.
Championships, first-team all star selections, Games Played, the opinion of the Hockey News...There's a lot there.
Rob L said:I mean again, we're talking about a 6 team league here when we're talking Horton's accolades.
But that doesn't make it easier. Talent is more concentrated in a 6 team league, not less. We're going to give Salming more credit because he got to beat up on the Kansas City Scouts while Horton had real games night-in and night-out? Let's not forget that Salming's best years came during a era where the talent was diluted in the NHL not just because of expansion but also because of the WHA. After the WHA folded Salming was a cumulative -11 for the rest of his career.
edit: just looking at it, it's astonishing how much the league expanded and so quickly. The league Salming joined had gone from 6 teams to 16 teams in just seven years. By the time Salming established himself the number of teams in the league had tripled from '67 in just 9 years.
Rob L said:It's really just a universe of difference there. Now don't get me wrong, Horton was a fine player and like I said earlier, there's probably a few choices than can be made for the "greatest" and far be it from me to tell folks what/how to think. This is just an opinion here that I happen to share with Ulmer. - A good read for anyone interested.
Like I said, if someone wants to say that Salming is their choice for the best Leafs defenseman of all time in spite of the evidence against it...go nuts. Just don't try and sell that there's no debate on the matter.