Highlander
Active member
What in hecks name is going on...Why hasn't Nylander been traded as yet?? This is a travesty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frycer14 said:On the other hand, this could be a perfect time to trade him. You'd likely get value back, instead of simply shedding dollars like a month ago.
Bullfrog said:I wish we had nice things!
Let's trade away our nice things!
You don't trade a Nylander or a Marner. You can trade a Kerfoot, or a Hyman or a Moore etc.Frycer14 said:Bullfrog said:I wish we had nice things!
Let's trade away our nice things!
We need some nice things on defense, and the cap room to keep them.
Highlander said:You don't trade a Nylander or a Marner. You can trade a Kerfoot, or a Hyman or a Moore etc.Frycer14 said:Bullfrog said:I wish we had nice things!
Let's trade away our nice things!
We need some nice things on defense, and the cap room to keep them.
He went with Sparks based on age, that he was lights out in the Calder Cup and looked like the heir apparent to the back up job. Mcbackup was just that, coming off a career year and was not expected to play at that rate forever and although he had a decent year with Carolina last year he has not been great with Tampa this year.. I would have made the same move as Dubas, now let me look into my crystal ball again.hockeyfan1 said:Highlander said:You don't trade a Nylander or a Marner. You can trade a Kerfoot, or a Hyman or a Moore etc.Frycer14 said:Bullfrog said:I wish we had nice things!
Let's trade away our nice things!
We need some nice things on defense, and the cap room to keep them.
I always thought so. Why did even both to draft them if you?re not going to keep their skill set?
It?s up to Dubas to brainstorm about the back-up goaltending situation. Didn?t Babcock prefer McElhinney over Sparks? I?d take McBackup any day.
Highlander said:He went with Sparks based on age, that he was lights out in the Calder Cup and looked like the heir apparent to the back up job. Mcbackup was just that, coming off a career year and was not expected to play at that rate forever and although he had a decent year with Carolina last year he has not been great with Tampa this year.. I would have made the same move as Dubas, now let me look into my crystal ball again.hockeyfan1 said:Highlander said:You don't trade a Nylander or a Marner. You can trade a Kerfoot, or a Hyman or a Moore etc.Frycer14 said:Bullfrog said:I wish we had nice things!
Let's trade away our nice things!
We need some nice things on defense, and the cap room to keep them.
I always thought so. Why did even both to draft them if you?re not going to keep their skill set?
It?s up to Dubas to brainstorm about the back-up goaltending situation. Didn?t Babcock prefer McElhinney over Sparks? I?d take McBackup any day.
Agree with everything you said here. Hindsight is a wonderful thing tho.Highlander said:He went with Sparks based on age, that he was lights out in the Calder Cup and looked like the heir apparent to the back up job. Mcbackup was just that, coming off a career year and was not expected to play at that rate forever and although he had a decent year with Carolina last year he has not been great with Tampa this year.. I would have made the same move as Dubas, now let me look into my crystal ball again.hockeyfan1 said:Highlander said:You don't trade a Nylander or a Marner. You can trade a Kerfoot, or a Hyman or a Moore etc.Frycer14 said:Bullfrog said:I wish we had nice things!
Let's trade away our nice things!
We need some nice things on defense, and the cap room to keep them.
I always thought so. Why did even both to draft them if you?re not going to keep their skill set?
It?s up to Dubas to brainstorm about the back-up goaltending situation. Didn?t Babcock prefer McElhinney over Sparks? I?d take McBackup any day.
I would say that all our crystal balls have some pretty cloudy inclusions.Guilt Trip said:Agree with everything you said here. Hindsight is a wonderful thing tho.Highlander said:He went with Sparks based on age, that he was lights out in the Calder Cup and looked like the heir apparent to the back up job. Mcbackup was just that, coming off a career year and was not expected to play at that rate forever and although he had a decent year with Carolina last year he has not been great with Tampa this year.. I would have made the same move as Dubas, now let me look into my crystal ball again.hockeyfan1 said:Highlander said:You don't trade a Nylander or a Marner. You can trade a Kerfoot, or a Hyman or a Moore etc.Frycer14 said:Bullfrog said:I wish we had nice things!
Let's trade away our nice things!
We need some nice things on defense, and the cap room to keep them.
I always thought so. Why did even both to draft them if you?re not going to keep their skill set?
It?s up to Dubas to brainstorm about the back-up goaltending situation. Didn?t Babcock prefer McElhinney over Sparks? I?d take McBackup any day.
Sugo is also a personal favourite of mine, so I had to ask Nylander what his order is. I?m partial to the rigatoni in a spicy rose sauce.
?I like the rigatoni a lot,? said Nylander. ?And I like the gnocchi Bolognese.?
herman said:Nylander, in about half a season, has tied his career high EV goals total (15) and is 3 goals from matching his career high (22).