Nik V. Debs said:
I said that Dickey, before this season, had never even had a season over 4.0 bWAR and that Johnson had only had two. That's to highlight the relatively low value of their other seasons, not suggesting that 4.0 is a great season. BR, whose formula you've been using, puts an "all-star" season at 5.0
Well admitttedly, I'm not all too familiar with WAR, but I think there's two problems - one is that you're kind of going back and forth between two different calculations of it. The other is saying something like Johnson's only had two 4.0+ seasons when BR had his all-star seasons at 6.4 and 6.8 respectively (fan graphs has him at 5.6 and 6.4, or "superstar"). That's like saying Bautista's only hit 30+ homers twice. It's not wrong, but it's not really telling the whole story.
By either site's measurements, Dickey had an all-star year last year and was very good the previous two years.
I disagree to an extent here because the Miami deal was largely motivated, I think we can agree, by salary issues and so the Jays got an inordinately large return on what they gave up. The Mayor of New York isn't going to be petitioning Major League Baseball to overturn this deal.
While the cost is up for debate, Dickey was most certainly dealt due to salary issues. And the latter has more to do with optics than anything else.
Well, I completely disagree about Buehrle as the guy is about as consistent a property as you get in the bigs.
In terms of what? You seem to be stressing the importance of WAR and if it is the great predictor, Beuhrle's on the decline.
So the Jays should trade Sanchez then for a marginal left-handed reliever? Osuna and Gose for a good bat off the bench? Why leave any cards in the deck if this year is all or nothing and winning in 2013 is paramount to all other considerations?
Of course not. That's not a reasonable argument.
No, but that's clearly not an argument I was ever making. I mean, there is a huge, huge, huge difference between trading a guy who is now a great candidate for the Jays top prospect for a marginal player in a position we don't need filled and trading two top prospects for a guy coming off what anyone would agree was an all-star year that ended with a Cy Young. Just as I never said you were against all forms of risk, I am not advocating winning at all costs. But, when you make the decision to invest heavily into the roster, you've got to do it 110%. That doesn't mean you lose all common sense, but the market has established what it costs to get good pitching and unfortunately, that price is extremely high.
We're talking about where a line gets drawn, not whether there is one or not. There will be a 2014, even if Josh Johnson isn't around. Making the Miami deal, paring down the club's prospect depth to acquire players who you yourself say have question marks, is reason to be more careful with future deals, not less. D'Arnaud and Syndergaard weren't going away. Trades can be made in-season. There was no rush or need to compound the risk of the Miami deal by immediately making another risky deal.
Even if you did believe that nothing matters more than the upcoming season there are ways to go heavier on it that aren't this, that don't carry the risk of trading away two of the team's top three prospects.
Are there though? You can see the cost of pitching nowadays. Shields went for one of the best prospects in baseball. Greinke got $147m with another $11m in bonuses. Anibal Sanchez is a $16m/year player. If you don't think the Jays needed another good starter, that's fine or if you think Dickey wasn't the right guy, that's understandable, but you cannot get good pitching for nothing. The cost for established major league pitching is extremely high.
Spending a bunch of money on Edwin Jackson/Adam Laroche might be dumb but nobody would say "Boy, is that risky" and they combined for the same 5.6 WAR last season that Dickey had.
That's assuming that spending a bunch of money is even possible. AA has mentioned more than a few times that he doesn't have an endless supply of cash. AA took on a bunch of contracts with MIA and it looks like he's pretty much run out of payroll flexibility. To make the deal work with the Mets, he sent them Buck ($6m) and Dickey's still on his $5m club option, though I've heard reports that the money might be more spread out than usual. So, for next season AA really actually dropped salary if he sticks to the club option, or likely added a couple million as opposed to the $15-18m needed to sign Jackson and Laroche.
But more to the point, you keep glossing over the specifics as if it's immaterial to what I'm saying when it's the bulk of what I'm saying. Whether or not Dickey is worth what they gave up is the bulk of why I don't like this deal, not a blanket aversion to risk(even if I do feel risk shouldn't be compounded by more of it).
Well, from what I can tell you're arguing two things: (1) they gave up too much for Dickey and (2) they didn't need to add another arm and now is not the time to try to win. The former I'm inclined to agree with you - I don't feel comfortable paying that price, but it's not unreasonable, it's just unfortunate.
I don't see how I'm "glossing over details", but if I am it's because we fundamentally disagree on the second part of the argument. There is an opportunity in the AL East next season to do real, serious damage. There is an opportunity to make the playoffs and in a big way. AA helped create that opportunity by acquiring major league talent from a team that wanted to cut costs. Now he's acquired the NL Cy Young winner. I get that Dickey is unconventional in pretty much every way. He's old, he's a knuckleballer, his success is recent and until last year, he was good but not great. I got to say as a Jays fan I've seen a lot of losers and while this may blow up in AA's face, he put himself in a position to win by loading up on minor league talent then dealing from a position of strength to address his major league weaknesses. Frankly, it's about time. JP wasn't creative enough to go all in properly and as a result he built a good-but-not-good-enough team. AA isn't taking that chance.