Nik said:cw said:L K said:The ring thing especially made me roll my eyes because it really highlights how self important the board thinks they are. You did absolutely nothing to impact the medals.
Also why has there not been more criticism of the Oilers and Bob Nicholson.
That to me is like stealing money from little kids
And what makes it particularly egregious is that this is a sport where a lot of kids have either restricted their involvement or never started playing at all because of the high costs.
Obviously the cost of these rings wouldn't materially change that but it definitely again speaks to the idea that these guys just have no idea about the optics of their behaviour.
Like many in Canada, I grew up with a little rink my Dad made in our backyard.
There were natural rinks in all the parks and schools around us.
Skates, gloves, stick, maybe shin pads and away we'd go.
I was addicted and usually played from about 3pm when school got out until they turned off the lights at 10pm.
It cost me 10 cents per day. My mother insisted I had to call home via pay phone every day to say I wouldn't be home for dinner. That was 10 cents more than most guys had to pay.
I played organized hockey with full equipment but most of the time, I played shinny without full equipment and was happier doing that.
Climate change pretty much ended natural rinks.
I was able to make one for my kids when they were very young. Got too warm.
Along with equipment for safety, the costs skyrocketed.
Hockey Canada needs to spend their time addressing that. It is a formidable challenge they probably won't be able to overcome. If they don't, hockey in Canada will be more rare due to its expense - like polo. Climate and sport economics will continue to push more Canadians towards more affordable and safer activities like soccer, baseball, basketball, etc
In the interim, at least the sexual assault victims will be muzzled & paid off, the perpetrators free and maybe the lawyers can design the board of directors some $3,000 rings for that!