Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They had to be this bad in their super tank year no? They basically traded everything to try and get McDavidHeroic Shrimp said:bustaheims said:Heroic Shrimp said:https://twitter.com/BrendanKeany/status/1371633836627464194
I feel like this is bad.
No one should have really expected Buffalo to be good, but I would not have predicted they'd be this bad.
I'm not sure anybody knew it was actually possible to be this bad.
Zee said:They had to be this bad in their super tank year no? They basically traded everything to try and get McDavidHeroic Shrimp said:bustaheims said:Heroic Shrimp said:https://twitter.com/BrendanKeany/status/1371633836627464194
I feel like this is bad.
No one should have really expected Buffalo to be good, but I would not have predicted they'd be this bad.
I'm not sure anybody knew it was actually possible to be this bad.
What a sad sack team.Heroic Shrimp said:Zee said:They had to be this bad in their super tank year no? They basically traded everything to try and get McDavidHeroic Shrimp said:bustaheims said:Heroic Shrimp said:https://twitter.com/BrendanKeany/status/1371633836627464194
I feel like this is bad.
No one should have really expected Buffalo to be good, but I would not have predicted they'd be this bad.
I'm not sure anybody knew it was actually possible to be this bad.
This team is on a 49 point pace. The season ending before Eichel was drafted they picked up 54 points. Close, but worse now. Although their goal share of 38% this year is slightly better than their 37% goal share back then.
It gets worse:Zee said:What a sad sack team.Heroic Shrimp said:Zee said:They had to be this bad in their super tank year no? They basically traded everything to try and get McDavidHeroic Shrimp said:bustaheims said:Heroic Shrimp said:https://twitter.com/BrendanKeany/status/1371633836627464194
I feel like this is bad.
No one should have really expected Buffalo to be good, but I would not have predicted they'd be this bad.
I'm not sure anybody knew it was actually possible to be this bad.
This team is on a 49 point pace. The season ending before Eichel was drafted they picked up 54 points. Close, but worse now. Although their goal share of 38% this year is slightly better than their 37% goal share back then.
He returned for the 2nd period I believe so that's good news. They need to get control of those crosschecks.herman said:Uncalled crosscheck too
bustaheims said:The over head shot definitely provides the needed context. That a serious charging penalty. 5 and a game is the minimum for that.
Charging - A minor or major penalty shall be imposed on a player or goalkeeper who skates or jumps into, or charges an opponent in any manner. Charging shall mean that the actions of a player or goalkeeper who, as a result of distance traveled, shall violently check and opponent in any manner.
Boarding. A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player who checks or pushes a defenseless opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to hit or impact the boards violently or dangerously. The severity of the penalty, based upon the impact with the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.
OldTimeHockey said:bustaheims said:The over head shot definitely provides the needed context. That a serious charging penalty. 5 and a game is the minimum for that.
I don't know that it's a "serious" charging penalty as I think hits like this happen nightly, but I see no real issue with the call on the ice.
bustaheims said:OldTimeHockey said:bustaheims said:The over head shot definitely provides the needed context. That a serious charging penalty. 5 and a game is the minimum for that.
I don't know that it's a "serious" charging penalty as I think hits like this happen nightly, but I see no real issue with the call on the ice.
You don't see a lot of hits where the guys skates from across the ice at full speed to deliver the hit. You see a lot where they glide from far out, but Tanev had his feet moving much later in the play than you see on a nightly basis.
OldTimeHockey said:I think without the injury, you don't see much discussion about the hit. I agree it's a dangerous play though.
It was dangerous in that the player receiving the check was in that danger zone away from the boards. If that happens at centre ice and the player simply takes the hit and slides into open ice, we're probably not even discussing it today.
CarltonTheBear said:With that distance travelled there'd still be a discussion. I really don't think you see charges like that in the game today very often.
bustaheims said:OldTimeHockey said:I think without the injury, you don't see much discussion about the hit. I agree it's a dangerous play though.
It was dangerous in that the player receiving the check was in that danger zone away from the boards. If that happens at centre ice and the player simply takes the hit and slides into open ice, we're probably not even discussing it today.
If it happens at center ice, unless Tanev is coming from in front of him, he can't travel as far or get up to as high a speed. So, we're not talking apples to apple here. The fact is this was a blindside hit, with excessive force, to a player in a vulnerable position. Even without the injury, it's one that needs to be flagged.
I'd be curious as to how many crosschecking penalties have been called this year. It's almost like it's an obsolete penalty.herman said:Uncalled crosscheck too