CarltonTheBear said:
Joe said:
For all those up in arms about Reaves not ?taking action? (who I?m in I way defending, was he ever on the ice at the same time as Marchand? I?m assuming not because Boston has last change.
And has Marchand ever been taken to task by anyone? Some of you make this sound like this is a leafs problem, but he?s been a slippery weasel for his entire career and seems that no team ever does anything to him.
You're right about Reaves v. Marchand specifically. I didn't expect anyone to go out there and beat the snot out of him. And quite frankly even if they did aside from making some fans feel better it wouldn't have changed anything: Lily would still have been hurt and Marchand would still continue to gleefully attempt to injure his peers until his miserable career ends. It's also why the argument that Bennett would have never attempted to injure Knies in the playoffs if Reaves was in the line-up was and always has been foolish.
But, like, nothing from Reaves after that? He doesn't have to go after Marchand, or even try and hurt another player to get some pound of flesh, but he can't throw a 4th liner through the boards at some point? He can't grab a guy after a whistle in a scrum and just throw him around a little bit? Ditto for guys like Bertuzzi and Domi who were supposed to provide that stuff? And as ZBBM said if you aren't going to react with that sort of toughness you can at least beat them on the scoreboard and aside from a 2-minute offensive outburst the team in general kind of acted like that game meant nothing to them. It's tough to not be a little disappointed in that as a fan.
I think the issue with the Leafs team that is hard to reconcile is that there is a belief that there is enough talent on this team to win a cup, but that in order for that to happen, things have to align properly.
That doesn't mean that things don't have to align properly for other teams, but maybe there are less things that need to align. If we look at things at a very high level and take Vegas as a use case, the only thing they needed to have align for them last year was their goaltending. That was the only question that they needed to have answered. Sure there were all the other questions that every team needs to answer, like health, and if guys don't get cold or play up to their ability, but the only real question mark they had as a team was would the goaltending be able to make the saves that they needed them to make. There offensive depth was good, they had game breakers, and their 6 defensemen were among the best in the league. So chances were that they were going to win a fair amount of games if the goaltending didn't let them down.
It's like the reverse of the Leafs though. There are questions about the defense, there are questions about the offensive depth, and there are questions about the goaltending. Sure, if all those things align, the Leafs could win a cup because they know they have the top end talent part to compete with other teams.
This is what leads to most of the arguments on here about the team, because both sides are right with their assumptions. The people who want to look at the positive side, like Guilt Trip, can point to the core of Reilly, Matthews, Nylander, Marner, and Tavares and say it's a really good core, probably one of the best cores in the league. And if you have a strong core, you will make the playoffs, and once you are in the playoffs, you have a chance to win. That core could win a cup. Hell Karlsson dragged the Ottawa Senators to the conference finals pretty much by himself. The Leafs have 4 players that are capable of that kind of dominance.
However, those that want to look at the negative side of things, like Azzuri63, also have a point. This team has weaknesses, and probably more weaknesses than other teams that get papered over because of the strength of the core. If the core doesn't produce, or has a bad game, or has bad luck, or is outperformed by the players on the other team, there isn't anything there for the team to fallback on. There isn't enough depth/defensive structure/goaltending to overcome that.
So is it possible for this team to win a cup? I would say yes, it is possible. Is it likely? That's where I have a hard time coming up with a number. I think it's more likely than some other teams, but I don't think I would put them in the same category as Vegas, New Jersey, Colorado, or Carolina.
All of this is just a really long winded way of saying that both sides are right, which is why the arguments persist.