• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Burke Fired

Frank E said:
Burke towed the league line, was always respectful of his fellow GM's, was very respectful of players, and is a character that would get the league some more press.

You know, when he wasn't challenging them to fights in barns.
 
Nik Pollock said:
Frank E said:
Burke towed the league line, was always respectful of his fellow GM's, was very respectful of players, and is a character that would get the league some more press.

You know, when he wasn't challenging them to fights in barns.

Fair point.

However, his reasoning was that Kevin Lowe was being personally disrespectful given that they had a relationship, and that he could have given him a "head's up".

I think you'll agree, that spat was more a fight between friends.   
 
If the Leafs had simply made the playoffs the 2010 draft year, the players available at the 16th spot had names like Derek Forbort, Vladimir Tarasenko and Joey Hishon. 

If the Leafs had simply made the playoffs the 2011 draft year, the players available at the 16th spot had names like Joel Armia, J. T. Miller and Jamie Oleksiak. 

If the trade had been Kessel @ a ppg for Joey Hishon and Joel Armia it would have been a much different story.  but...like Z B-B McFate said...Kessel was NOT a franchise player anyway.
 
Frank E said:
Fair point.

However, his reasoning was that Kevin Lowe was being personally disrespectful given that they had a relationship, and that he could have given him a "head's up".

I think you'll agree, that spat was more a fight between friends. 

That was just me being all funny-like. That said, I think Burke is a guy who probably rubbed some people the wrong way. From little things like the thing with Murray at the draft or essentially accusing all GM's who gave out front loaded deals of circumventing the cap or trying to pass off Pittsburgh's success as luck or...
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
cw said:
His retooling effort was likely doomed unless they gave him something like a six year extension.

Or he hadn't short-circuited himself by dealing for Kessel, who is simply not a guy you build a franchise around, yet Burke paid like that for him.  And sticking too long, way too long, with Wilson, who was not the right guy to oversee a retool, let alone the rebuild that should have been undertaken.

The italicized part is something that can be argued for sure, but the bolded part makes no sense to me. How can an excellent offensive player not be a piece to build around?
 
Bullfrog said:
The italicized part is something that can be argued for sure, but the bolded part makes no sense to me. How can an excellent offensive player not be a piece to build around?

I think the difference there is between a "Franchise Player" and being "a piece". It's semantic-y, obviously, but I think there's a legitimate difference.
 
Sure there's a difference, but I don't think the team necessarily needs a franchise player. A couple more players of Kessel's caliber would fine for me.
 
Bullfrog said:
Sure there's a difference, but I don't think the team necessarily needs a franchise player.

Fair enough, but that's the disagreement. When people say Kessel isn't a guy you build around, what they're saying is he's not a franchise player.
 
Nik Pollock said:
Frank E said:
Fair point.

However, his reasoning was that Kevin Lowe was being personally disrespectful given that they had a relationship, and that he could have given him a "head's up".

I think you'll agree, that spat was more a fight between friends. 

That was just me being all funny-like. That said, I think Burke is a guy who probably rubbed some people the wrong way. From little things like the thing with Murray at the draft or essentially accusing all GM's who gave out front loaded deals of circumventing the cap or trying to pass off Pittsburgh's success as luck or...

I think the Murray thing was really inconsequential.  He was right, and Bettman and much of the league supported the assertion that those contracts were a circumvention, and so much so that they sure hit those offending teams hard in this new CBA. 

And I don't think his shot at the Pittsburgh model was a shot at anyone but the reporter asking the question. 
 
Frank E said:
I think the Murray thing was really inconsequential.  He was right, and Bettman and much of the league supported the assertion that those contracts were a circumvention, and so much so that they sure hit those offending teams hard in this new CBA. 

And I don't think his shot at the Pittsburgh model was a shot at anyone but the reporter asking the question.

I'm just putting it out there that there are reasons why some GM's might not like Burke even if they haven't been challenged to a round or two behind the farm house. Just in general I agree with cw that the likelihood is that the league will go a little lower key when it comes to replacing Gary Bettman.
 
IMO, which in the grand scheme doesn't mean much, timing is critical in such a firing. This whole event screams "we are winging it". In the grand scheme of things the leafs are a bubble team with or without Loungo.  I belive that team defense is the issue and that Carlyle will struggle to correct it. Wilson ignored it completely. Burke could have been fired at the end of this season and nobody would have questioned it. I think that someone in the backrooms needed to pi$$ higher on the tree than Burke. I also feel that Nonis did not look comfortable with the way it all shook out today. In the end it looks like MLSE emasculated their GM and respected hockey man at the critical point of the upcoming season. Optics implies that the owners will meddle in hockey decisions to the probable detriment of the team where the toronto maple leafs are concerned. Hence the inevitable comparison to the ballard years.  I think the owners today said more about their hockey ignorance  today by firing burke than burkes failure to turn around the team. I belive that burke made mistakes during his time as GM but not enough credit was given to the wreck that JFJ had created.  Unbelievably ownership had lost patience with Quinn after one mediocre season only to arrive to today where today will repeat the mistake. Time of couse will tell but ultimately leafs fans will look back on today with regret
 
Nik Pollock said:
Frank E said:
I think the Murray thing was really inconsequential.  He was right, and Bettman and much of the league supported the assertion that those contracts were a circumvention, and so much so that they sure hit those offending teams hard in this new CBA. 

And I don't think his shot at the Pittsburgh model was a shot at anyone but the reporter asking the question.

I'm just putting it out there that there are reasons why some GM's might not like Burke even if they haven't been challenged to a round or two behind the farm house. Just in general I agree with cw that the likelihood is that the league will go a little lower key when it comes to replacing Gary Bettman.
I don't really see how Bill Daly doesn't take over for Bettman. He's groomed for the job and seems like he'd do a good job as well. Burke may get an NHL front office job again but commissioner? Can't see it.
 
Nik Pollock said:
Frank E said:
I think the Murray thing was really inconsequential.  He was right, and Bettman and much of the league supported the assertion that those contracts were a circumvention, and so much so that they sure hit those offending teams hard in this new CBA. 

And I don't think his shot at the Pittsburgh model was a shot at anyone but the reporter asking the question.

I'm just putting it out there that there are reasons why some GM's might not like Burke even if they haven't been challenged to a round or two behind the farm house. Just in general I agree with cw that the likelihood is that the league will go a little lower key when it comes to replacing Gary Bettman.

So not Dana White style?
 
Justin said:
I do remember that, but is there aren't many excuses for letting in 15 goals in 3 Stanley Cup finals games. That's horrid. I'm also saying Canada won in spite of Luongo because he let in that horrible Parise goal with 24 seconds left in regulation.

....but he also made that very alert save in the OT session, when Team Canada d-man Scott Niedermayer made an errant pass behind his own goal, onto the stick of an oncoming Team USA forward (forgot who it was), and Luongo stopped the shot.  After that play, a few plays later, Crosby scored the OT winner.
 
Madferret said:
Joe S. said:
Madferret said:
Fact: McCowan's show is now being prescribed as a sleep aid and is considered a class 2 controlled substance

Omg shut up. You've popped out of nowhere just to troll here? Contribute or move along.
 
Yeah you're probably right - enjoy your 3 ring flea circus it should be one hell of a season for the teams that aren't addicted to the smell of their own farts.
Take a deep breath Joe it will be April and all over in no time.

Hey MF. good to see you back here.  Can hardly wait for the Pick'em Challenge again!  This shortened season will make it a little tougher to choose the winners, I guess.  Well, we'll see to that.  See 'ya soon over there!  And everyone else, too!  :)
 
A part of me was stunned and a part of me wasn't.  Mixed emotions, I suppose, upon learning of Burke having been fired.

Rogers & Bell obviously didn't agree with some of Burke's principles --  (and it cannot be only on the subject of Luongo only) -- and/or decision-making regarding the direction of the team (choice/timing/etc.).

Wherever Burke goes, I wish him well.  (Even staying on as "senior advisor", it's doubtful he will be with the organization for long or even in another capacity).  I admire Burke for standing firm in his beliefs through thick and thin.  Sometimes not the best of decisions, but one can give him credit for at least trying to attempt to remake the Leafs into a more respectable, forward-looking club -- farm team/draft/prospects/etc.  Burke wasn't perfect, by far and wide no, but he tried.  Can't fault him for that.
 
cw said:

The story I read between the lines is that he was a bit of a prima donna without the record to justify it and new ownership didn't like it.

Personally I feel it is a mistake.  Burke has a good record in his moves.  Most of his moves added more talent to the club then it subtracted.  I hope Nonis will continue the record, but I don't feel he is at the level of Burke as GM.
 
Nik Pollock said:
Bullfrog said:
Sure there's a difference, but I don't think the team necessarily needs a franchise player.

Fair enough, but that's the disagreement. When people say Kessel isn't a guy you build around, what they're saying is he's not a franchise player.

I can understand that. I still think it was a fair trade, but I'm starting to better understand the opinion that it wasn't the right timing. I'll never quite get there, but I certainly see that side of the argument.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top