S
Stebro
Guest
wohoo, just like I predicted!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heroic Shrimp said:"Tamp-ons Overwhelmed by Three Ugly Periods"
leafsjunkie said:Tigger said:leafsjunkie said:I hate to say it, but 5-1 lightning. I have no faith in Gus.
How about the rest of the team, any faith there?
The team is decimated with injuries and Gus isn't very good. We've also not had much luck vs the Bolts and they're due for a big win.
I hope the Leafs win and if they do I'll be estatic. I just don't have a good feel for tonight's game.
cw said:Jake Gardiner is leading NHL rookie scoring for dmen with 7 points. He's tied for 11th overall in rookie scoring. He's tied for 54th overall in dmen scoring.
Nugent-Hopkins and Enroth would likely be ahead of him in Calder voting right now but he might be the 3rd-5th best rookie at the 1/4 pole.
Bender said:I feel like Enroth has been in the league a while now. Kinda cheap how backup goaltenders have the same rule in the sense that a forward who doesn't reach the threshold would likely be sent down, while backups can reap the benefits of working with NHL level coaching for years.
Bender said:cw said:Jake Gardiner is leading NHL rookie scoring for dmen with 7 points. He's tied for 11th overall in rookie scoring. He's tied for 54th overall in dmen scoring.
Nugent-Hopkins and Enroth would likely be ahead of him in Calder voting right now but he might be the 3rd-5th best rookie at the 1/4 pole.
I feel like Enroth has been in the league a while now. Kinda cheap how backup goaltenders have the same rule in the sense that a forward who doesn't reach the threshold would likely be sent down, while backups can reap the benefits of working with NHL level coaching for years.
Saint Nik said:groundskeeper willie said:All the talk of potential headlines tonight and nobody comes up with the obvious/great one on TSN: "Thunderstruck"
But they're the Lightning, not the Thunder. And our team is the Leafs. That doesn't even make sense.
hockeyfan1 said:Quote
"The guys are playing great, scoring a lot of goals, and workng hard in both ends", said Gustavvson who made 27 saves.
"So that's good for the team and it feels
good to play when you see them score goals".
Source: Sportsnet
cw said:oi_not_again Paul Coughlan
Lightning lose 7-1 to Leafs. The #NHL really needs to do something about that stifling 1-3-1 that seems to only mystify the Flyers.
Tampa won 3 of 4 against the Flyers last year in the regular season, losing one game in a shootout.
cw said:Forgot to mention that some of the calls last night were pretty bad.
The non existent (in my opinion) interference call to Connolly is one example. Rosehill's holding of the stick was another that was questionable (I'd need a better replay to be sure). The non-call for knocking Gustavsson down - it was a late hit if not a foul anyway. For a while there, I wondered if the refs were trying to keep the Bolts in the game.
Thankfully, it didn't cost the Leafs a point.
cw said:Forgot to mention that some of the calls last night were pretty bad.
The non existent (in my opinion) interference call to Connolly is one example. Rosehill's holding of the stick was another that was questionable (I'd need a better replay to be sure). The non-call for knocking Gustavsson down - it was a late hit if not a foul anyway. For a while there, I wondered if the refs were trying to keep the Bolts in the game.
Thankfully, it didn't cost the Leafs a point.
cw said:Forgot to mention that some of the calls last night were pretty bad.
The non existent (in my opinion) interference call to Connolly is one example. Rosehill's holding of the stick was another that was questionable (I'd need a better replay to be sure). The non-call for knocking Gustavsson down - it was a late hit if not a foul anyway. For a while there, I wondered if the refs were trying to keep the Bolts in the game.
Thankfully, it didn't cost the Leafs a point.
leafsjunkie said:cw said:Forgot to mention that some of the calls last night were pretty bad.
The non existent (in my opinion) interference call to Connolly is one example. Rosehill's holding of the stick was another that was questionable (I'd need a better replay to be sure). The non-call for knocking Gustavsson down - it was a late hit if not a foul anyway. For a while there, I wondered if the refs were trying to keep the Bolts in the game.
Thankfully, it didn't cost the Leafs a point.
The officiating is so inconsistant it's almost sickening. I'm just a fan and I get confused as to what is and what isn't a penalty. I can't imagine what the players think actually playing in the games. How did Franson? (I think) get a penalty for interference and the Lightning player called for diving, when Franson didn't even touch him? It should have been just a diving (unsportsman like conduct) penalty. Yeah the Connolly one was awful, Gus gets hit, from behind to boot and knocked down andt the ref mouths words and points, something to the effect that you were out of your crease and fair game? So hitting from behind is still acceptable? I wish we could give penalties to the refs for being morons.
cw said:Forgot to mention that some of the calls last night were pretty bad.
The non existent (in my opinion) interference call to Connolly is one example. Rosehill's holding of the stick was another that was questionable (I'd need a better replay to be sure). The non-call for knocking Gustavsson down - it was a late hit if not a foul anyway. For a while there, I wondered if the refs were trying to keep the Bolts in the game.
Thankfully, it didn't cost the Leafs a point.
leafsjunkie said:cw said:Forgot to mention that some of the calls last night were pretty bad.
The non existent (in my opinion) interference call to Connolly is one example. Rosehill's holding of the stick was another that was questionable (I'd need a better replay to be sure). The non-call for knocking Gustavsson down - it was a late hit if not a foul anyway. For a while there, I wondered if the refs were trying to keep the Bolts in the game.
Thankfully, it didn't cost the Leafs a point.
The officiating is so inconsistant it's almost sickening. I'm just a fan and I get confused as to what is and what isn't a penalty. I can't imagine what the players think actually playing in the games. How did Franson? (I think) get a penalty for interference and the Lightning player called for diving, when Franson didn't even touch him? It should have been just a diving (unsportsman like conduct) penalty. Yeah the Connolly one was awful, Gus gets hit, from behind to boot and knocked down andt the ref mouths words and points, something to the effect that you were out of your crease and fair game? So hitting from behind is still acceptable? I wish we could give penalties to the refs for being morons.