Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
riff raff said:I think it's a bit of a mis-representation to say that Reimer was playing well before the "concussion-like" event.
Yes, he got a shutout in the first game, but there was a lot of luck (and goal posts) involved.
In the second game, he allowed five (5!) goals in the third period.
In fact, all of his games before the "concussion-like" event were against "lesser" opponents. (Gus then got thrown in against the Bruins, Flyers, Rangers and Penguins - the fact he actually won two of those games is stunning).
Burke, and many others, keep pointing to that hit on Reimer as an excuse for his play, but I think there was more to it than that.
caveman said:If Burke believes Reimer is a number 1 then he probably does not go after a guy like Halak, but picks up a veteran who is already a back-up like Biron.
CarltonTheBear said:I've been thinking about a little today, Kiprusoff anybody? Calgary might make him available, and while I'm sure the price will be high I don't think they'll be able to get a kings ransom for him considering his age and contract.
riff raff said:This obsession with a veteran goalie is problematic. What the Leafs need is a good goalie. An outstanding one would be nice, but we might be satisfied with a competent one.
Veteran does not necessarily equal good.
Take a look at the so-called veterans who will be available (FA or trade) and ask yourself: "will they be better than what we have?" Would a veteran be better than, say, Scrivens?
If not, then what's the point?
princedpw said:riff raff said:This obsession with a veteran goalie is problematic. What the Leafs need is a good goalie. An outstanding one would be nice, but we might be satisfied with a competent one.
Veteran does not necessarily equal good.
Take a look at the so-called veterans who will be available (FA or trade) and ask yourself: "will they be better than what we have?" Would a veteran be better than, say, Scrivens?
If not, then what's the point?
Yes.
And related: they do not need bad players who "lead" -- they need good players.
riff raff said:This obsession with a veteran goalie is problematic. What the Leafs need is a good goalie. An outstanding one would be nice, but we might be satisfied with a competent one.
bustaheims said:riff raff said:This obsession with a veteran goalie is problematic. What the Leafs need is a good goalie. An outstanding one would be nice, but we might be satisfied with a competent one.
Well, sure, but all these thigns are implied. What we're saying is the Leafs needs a goalie with all those things AND with enough experience to handle the pressure of playing in Toronto, not fold like a cheap suit if things start to go south and can be a mentor/positive influence on the young goalies in the organization.
moon111 said:I think the Leafs could of used an older goalie more off the ice then on it. Someone to say, "Don't listen to Ron Wilson, he's an idiot. Just go out there and play. And use what you can use from Allaire, but play your game. Forget the fans, media, coaches, and even the teammates. Go play, compete, but have fun." Think stress killed the goaltending more then any concussion ever did.
bustaheims said:riff raff said:This obsession with a veteran goalie is problematic. What the Leafs need is a good goalie. An outstanding one would be nice, but we might be satisfied with a competent one.
Well, sure, but all these thigns are implied. What we're saying is the Leafs needs a goalie with all those things AND with enough experience to handle the pressure of playing in Toronto, not fold like a cheap suit if things start to go south and can be a mentor/positive influence on the young goalies in the organization.
L K said:bustaheims said:riff raff said:This obsession with a veteran goalie is problematic. What the Leafs need is a good goalie. An outstanding one would be nice, but we might be satisfied with a competent one.
Well, sure, but all these thigns are implied. What we're saying is the Leafs needs a goalie with all those things AND with enough experience to handle the pressure of playing in Toronto, not fold like a cheap suit if things start to go south and can be a mentor/positive influence on the young goalies in the organization.
And the thing about a veteran goalie/good goalie, is that you need a guy with a track record to fill that role. Gus might put it together next year. Reimer might rebound from a sophomore slump. Scrivens might step in and be NHL capable. It's just too much MIGHT and not enough HAS and WILL.
The Leafs need an established veteran, because they need a guy who can reliable have a SV% over .900 for an entire season.