Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your fan base is excited about this season, the chance to win, and the years beyond as well, which gets me to this question: you have a lot of flexibility at this year?s trade deadline, really to do whatever you want, and yet you also know what lies ahead in the years to come (cap-wise). I suppose the easiest thing would be to go get a rental player, although you kind of hate giving away assets for a guy who won?t be around after this year?
Sure. And I think going back to those contracts (Matthews, Marner), if we have some certainty or some relative certainty about where the contracts for Auston and Mitch are going to come in, and we have more certainty at that time for where the salary cap will be for next season, we may be able to add players that are more than just rentals, that do have some term, whether it?s one, two or however many years left on their contracts. I think all those pieces kind of have to fit together. I don?t really look and see many pure rentals that really change the dynamic of our group. So anything that we?d be looking at would be players that probably have some term. That?s why it?s important for us to continue to work on those agreements with Auston and Mitch so we can have some cost certainty with them, so that we can look to improve our team this season and beyond.
Based on publicly available information, we can put together a list that gives us a glimpse of the current analytical landscape. Some teams without in-house analysts do work with outside companies such as HockeyData, Sportlogiq, and ICEBERG for their statistical data. Those systems are considered to be an essential bridge between publicly available data and camera-based tracking information. And there are some organizations with little analytical insight, if at all.
Mansbridge stole my Frikken quote. Bastedo! I wrote it years ago about three weeks ago.herman said:https://twitter.com/kyledubas/status/1132476347555766272
https://twitter.com/hockey_db/status/1132489417564803073
herman said:From: https://theathletic.com/1028571/2019/06/19/how-the-rangers-could-further-involve-analytics-in-the-front-offices-approach/
Based on publicly available information, we can put together a list that gives us a glimpse of the current analytical landscape. Some teams without in-house analysts do work with outside companies such as HockeyData, Sportlogiq, and ICEBERG for their statistical data. Those systems are considered to be an essential bridge between publicly available data and camera-based tracking information. And there are some organizations with little analytical insight, if at all.
What up.
Just a casual reminder that player tracking is coming and with it, massive datasets per game across the league, and if you want to leverage that dataset for an edge against the competition with access to the same data, it comes down to who can separate the signal from the noise and distill the information into actionable tactics and evaluations.
Frank E said:Really though, herman?
herman said:Frank E said:Really though, herman?
I thought we were just sharing funnies from the internet.