ZBBM
Well-known member
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I don't think it was like Thornton's, the puck was under Andersen's pad.
Uh, OK, why didn't they call that the first time?
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I don't think it was like Thornton's, the puck was under Andersen's pad.
So they call it a good goal and then on the challenge it's not. Makes alot of sense NHL lolZee said:Of course.
It's consistent there. If he touched the puck first I think it would have counted.Bender said:Good! This whole sequence is so stupid. Be consistent with the call. Jesus.
Agree with that. They should have said no goal right away.Deebo said:It's ridiculous that it had to be challenged
Guilt Trip said:Holl hasn't been good tonight and why is Rielly trying to make a move at the Habs Blueline? Dump it in.
L K said:So a non-call on a trip of Rielly leads to a scoring chance for Montreal at the end of the period. Looking forward to the selective officiating of the 3rd period
L K said:At what point do we consider a game a disappointment if Matthews and Marner don?t combine for 6 points?