• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Leafs @ Penguins - Nov. 27th, 7:30pm - TSN, SN 590

As much as I want to say that the focus should be on the team's poor play and not on officiating... the officiating was absolutely atrocious.
 
Snoopzilla said:
As much as I want to say that the focus should be on the team's poor play and not on officiating... the officiating was absolutely atrocious.

it was..but again..the leafs deserved what they got ...unless the officials told the leafs that there wouldn't be a third period
 
Snoopzilla said:
As much as I want to say that the focus should be on the team's poor play and not on officiating... the officiating was absolutely atrocious.

Yeah. I'm not blaming the officials for the loss. They're not the reason the Leafs couldn't get a shot on net after the 2nd period. However, poor officiating is poor officiating, and it deserves to be called out, regardless of how the game plays out.
 
Seth Rorabaugh ‏@emptynetters 8m
Carlyle on the penalty against Smithson in the third period: "I thought it was a pretty soft call. What?s he supposed to do?"

SmithsonHold.jpg
 
bustaheims said:
jonasTSN1050: Nazem Kadri just told me that he was told after collision with Zatkoff that there'd be no penalty. Pens were told same. Decision overruled.

Err...

The penalty was called by the referee at centre ice, not by the one in the zone that would have gotten to Kadri first. That's going to happen with a two-referee system.
 
The Leafs were also assessed a 25 min penalty. It was the "take no shots for 25 mins" penalty against a minor league goalie.
 
So can someone explain how Ranger is a better option than Gardiner and how Liles isn't good enough to be a #7 defenceman? I don't see the point of having slower, bigger defencemen who rarely use their size or clear guys from the net. It's like having a fighter on the 4th line every game playing less than 5 minutes and not fighting.

I also love that McLement/Kulemin were the 2nd group of forwards out in Overtime. Because that's what the Leafs need to win the game, one guy with one point and another with 1 goal in the last 30 games.

Of course that's just a minor criticism of what was an absolute mess of a game. You can talk all you want about the level of talent on Pittsburgh top 6 but it doesn't explain how Toronto literally cannot break out of their own zone. I thought defencemen pinching was supposed to be risky; every team's  defence pinches against Toronto and still Toronto cannot figure out how to exploit that. I seriously think that with Raycroft/Toskala level goaltending that they'd have no more than 2 or 3 wins. And that might be generous.
 
I think it might be time to split up the top defence pairing and see what happens. Go with:

Gardiner-Phaneuf
Gunnarsson-Rielly
Fraser/Ranger-Franson

edit: While I'm at it, have we called up Leivo yet?

JVR-Bozak-Kessel
Leivo-Kadri-Kulemin
Raymond-Smith-Clarkson
Smithson-McClement-Orr
 
crazyperfectdevil said:
Snoopzilla said:
As much as I want to say that the focus should be on the team's poor play and not on officiating... the officiating was absolutely atrocious.

it was..but again..the leafs deserved what they got ...unless the officials told the leafs that there wouldn't be a third period

Trying to watch the game as un-biased as possible I felt that the officiating was bad.  I haven't had chance to read this thread but the Smithson call was pretty weak and Orpik did the exact same thing out by the blue line in overtime except that Orpik didn't even have a stick and didn't get called.  I also thought that Letang had JVR's stick under his arm to control it (as players do) but JVR got called for hooking to put the Leafs 2 men down.

Also Malkin clearly pushed Bernier into the net with his stick on Bernier's pad before he shot the puck in.

We got one point.  Leafs didn't register a shot in the 3rd and overtime which as you allude to isn't the officials fault.

Hopefully next game will gel better for the Leafs.
 
Andy007 said:
So can someone explain how Ranger is a better option than Gardiner and how Liles isn't good enough to be a #7 defenceman? I don't see the point of having slower, bigger defencemen who rarely use their size or clear guys from the net. It's like having a fighter on the 4th line every game playing less than 5 minutes and not fighting.

I also love that McLement/Kulemin were the 2nd group of forwards out in Overtime. Because that's what the Leafs need to win the game, one guy with one point and another with 1 goal in the last 30 games.

Of course that's just a minor criticism of what was an absolute mess of a game. You can talk all you want about the level of talent on Pittsburgh top 6 but it doesn't explain how Toronto literally cannot break out of their own zone. I thought defencemen pinching was supposed to be risky; every team's  defence pinches against Toronto and still Toronto cannot figure out how to exploit that. I seriously think that with Raycroft/Toskala level goaltending that they'd have no more than 2 or 3 wins. And that might be generous.

x2 Andy

I was surprised when I got in tonight and my son told me Ranger was in for Gardiner...even though Gardiner had a rough game last time.  I wish Liles was up and Ranger was down.  Ranger has a NTC not s NMC.

I couldn't figure Carlyle's decisions out either when you have Kadri, JVR, Kessel, Raymond, and even Bozak and Clarkson who have had a nose for the net. 

As for being hemmed in, it was almost like some players knew what the coach had them practice and others couldn't remember or were panicked into bad decisions. It was pretty bad.
 
Dr. Bobby Leafer said:
LOL... Crashed when it was 4-1. Woke up to this.  :o

Me too. Our 2nd daughter wanted to sleep with us cause it was her birthday. I saw 4-1 and thought "good bounce back game". Man, what a disaster.
 
The Leafs are currently holding on the 2nd wild card. I am worried that those points (2 very winnable points against Columbus, 2 against Nashville, 1 against Penguins yesterday etc.) may haunt the Leafs down the road.
 
drummond said:
The Leafs are currently holding on the 2nd wild card. I am worried that those points (2 very winnable points against Columbus, 2 against Nashville, 1 against Penguins yesterday etc.) may haunt the Leafs down the road.


Over 80 games I doubt it. But one thing is for sure, Carlyle's system is not working, or not sinking in, thus his message is falling on deaf ears. that pitt game was like they came out in the third and played a whole dif system. what the coach did or said between periods  was wrong.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I think it might be time to split up the top defence pairing and see what happens. Go with:

Gardiner-Phaneuf
Gunnarsson-Rielly
Fraser/Ranger-Franson

edit: While I'm at it, have we called up Leivo yet?

JVR-Bozak-Kessel
Leivo-Kadri-Kulemin
Raymond-Smith-Clarkson
Smithson-McClement-Orr

I thought it was time to call up Leivo when Lupul went down, so.... yeah, make the call.

The officiating was bad, but not the cause for the loss. The Leafs scored enough goals IMO, it was their inability to shut the Pens down and keep the puck out of our zone that killed them.

I also think Carlyle released the NOS to early and burnt out his top players, killing them in the 3rd. Malkin was all over the net though most of the night with motivation to boot!

Tough loss, but I agree that for the next game, they need to ice better lines, like you have above. The only change I might make, is trying Rielly with Phaneuf and Gunnar with Franson or Gardiner.
 
BlueWhiteBlood said:
The only change I might make, is trying Rielly with Phaneuf and Gunnar with Franson or Gardiner.

The reason I had it the way I did is because Phaneuf, Rielly, and Franson are the only defencemen who seem comfortable playing the right side. And while Rielly has looked better than I expected, I would still like to see him sheltered a little bit.
 
I think last night showed why Gardiner should stay in the lineup.  The team struggles to break out of the zone on a good night and Gardiner is one of the best, if not the best, on the team at settling it down to break out.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
BlueWhiteBlood said:
The only change I might make, is trying Rielly with Phaneuf and Gunnar with Franson or Gardiner.

The reason I had it the way I did is because Phaneuf, Rielly, and Franson are the only defencemen who seem comfortable playing the right side. And while Rielly has looked better than I expected, I would still like to see him sheltered a little bit.

I don't disagree with that, certainly for the the left/right reason, but I really want to see what Rielly can do with top minutes beside Phaneuf. I'd worry about him defensively a bit, but I also think he has it in him to step up to meet that challenge.

On a side note; I thought Gardiner would have tightened up his game more by now, it's a bit disappointing. He scares me a lot when he has the puck in the defensive zone.
 
BlueWhiteBlood said:
On a side note; I thought Gardiner would have tightened up his game more by now, it's a bit disappointing. He scares me a lot when he has the puck in the defensive zone.

It's pretty interesting how opinions on this have differed this season. Gardiner is literally the last defenceman I would be worried about when the puck is on his stick.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
It's pretty interesting how opinions on this have differed this season. Gardiner is literally the last defenceman I would be worried about when the puck is on his stick.

Yeah, but with me it's more about the chances he takes, as opposed to his talent. He is going to be a very good defenceman, but he needs to learn to make the safe play if he does get in trouble. We all know how good he is at moving the puck, but off the glass is still a good play at times.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top