• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Leafs trade Lindholm for Nic Petan

Nic Petan is Semyon Der Arguchintsev but higher scoring, left shot, older, and with a beard, and according to hockeydb... shorter?!
 
Dubas was probably thinking about next year for this deal as much as this year. Lindholm was likely a goner this summer, and the team is going to need cheap players to fill the line-up/press box. Petan's a RFA this summer and will probably get a similar contract to the one he signed last summer (1 year, $874,125).

edit: Also considering Moore's promotion, there's a decent chance that Lindholm wouldn't have even played another game for the Leafs.
 
Guilt Trip said:
CarltonTheBear said:
Guilt Trip said:
But that was Babs moving him to wing. Lindholm was actually fine at centre but he had to get the Goat in.

Lindholm was put on the wing very early in the season. From games 4-10 he was on Kadri's line. If anything that was the reason people thought he looked better than he actually was.
Glad you're on top of it because I remember him being fine early on. Oh well, no need to worry anymore.

He was fine early on.  But then all of a sudden he wasn't 4C anymore.

Not that it matters really, he didn't do squat after that other than on the PK.  Let's hope that somehow the 4th line contributes more with this new guy.
 
herman said:
https://www.arcticicehockey.com/2018/10/10/17960236/nic-petan-winnipeg-jets-top-25-under-25

Well, who knows, maybe he turns out to be a decent player. 

Worth taking a chance on.

EDIT: Seems like this article is its own genre: if only X  and X and X happens, then Subject Player will blossom.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
herman said:
https://www.arcticicehockey.com/2018/10/10/17960236/nic-petan-winnipeg-jets-top-25-under-25

Well, who knows, maybe he turns out to be a decent player.  Worth taking a chance on.

He's not a Mitch Marner, but multiple 100-pt seasons in junior and then going a point per game in the AHL is not nothing.

Like Leivo, skill players need other skilled players to play with, and he wasn't getting that whatsoever with the Jets.
 
herman said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
herman said:
https://www.arcticicehockey.com/2018/10/10/17960236/nic-petan-winnipeg-jets-top-25-under-25

Well, who knows, maybe he turns out to be a decent player.  Worth taking a chance on.

He's not a Mitch Marner, but multiple 100-pt seasons in junior and then going a point per game in the AHL is not nothing.

Like Leivo, skill players need other skilled players to play with, and he wasn't getting that whatsoever with the Jets.

Oh I agree, perfectly happy with the trade.  In my addendum to the post, I just pointed out that the writer may be indulging in wishful thinking.  But there's no cost to the move, so let's hope for the best.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
herman said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
herman said:
https://www.arcticicehockey.com/2018/10/10/17960236/nic-petan-winnipeg-jets-top-25-under-25

Well, who knows, maybe he turns out to be a decent player.  Worth taking a chance on.

He's not a Mitch Marner, but multiple 100-pt seasons in junior and then going a point per game in the AHL is not nothing.

Like Leivo, skill players need other skilled players to play with, and he wasn't getting that whatsoever with the Jets.

Oh I agree, perfectly happy with the trade.  In my addendum to the post, I just pointed out that the writer may be indulging in wishful thinking.  But there's no cost to the move, so let's hope for the best.
And if he can replace the Goat, all is good.
 
https://twitter.com/markhmasters/status/1100152852360675330

Players the dev staff have directly maximized (or are in the process of maximizing): Gauthier, Marchment, Holl, Marincin, Moore, Dermott, Kapanen, Johnsson

Dubas coveted Yanni Gourde back in his AHL days...

https://twitter.com/LeafsNews/status/1100154270131867648
 
bustaheims said:
Guilt Trip said:
You know Philly would be asking for Johnsson or Kappy. If you were the Flyers would you do the Brown for Simmonds deal?

They took Hartman and a 4th for him, so . . .

Right...so I don't think I was that far off.
 
Frank E said:
bustaheims said:
Guilt Trip said:
You know Philly would be asking for Johnsson or Kappy. If you were the Flyers would you do the Brown for Simmonds deal?

They took Hartman and a 4th for him, so . . .

Right...so I don't think I was that far off.
But it doesn't mean Philly would have settled for that from the Leafs. I doubt we'll ever know what was the ask/offer. I'm pretty sure if it was Brown and a 4th, Dubas would have made that deal.
 
Simmonds would have played 4th line minutes and PP time, or taken taken away from Kapanen. Then he would have walked as an UFA. I'm not sure I'd take that over Brown who plays 4th line minutes and PK time, and will likely bring some sort of asset back in the summer if/when he's traded.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Simmonds would have played 4th line minutes and PP time, or taken taken away from Kapanen. Then he would have walked as an UFA. I'm not sure I'd take that over Brown who plays 4th line minutes and PK time, and will likely bring some sort of asset back in the summer if/when he's traded.

Yeah, I can't agree with that. 

I think a guy like Simmonds that plays a physical game could really help on Matthews' wing, especially in a Boston series.

I'm sure Dubas inquired, as there has been a fair bit of talk about the lack of grinders, and I'd guess that Philly just wasn't interested in such a deal...as busta said.
 
Frank E said:
Yeah, I can't agree with that. 

I think a guy like Simmonds that plays a physical game could really help on Matthews' wing, especially in a Boston series.

If this was two year ago I'd absolutely agree. He's a shadow of his former self these days. And if he was playing on Matthews wing he'd be holding him back.

Simmonds has 15 5-on-5 points this season, a P/60 of 1.11.

On the Leafs that would put him tied for 9th among forwards (with Connor Brown) in points, and dead last in points per 60 (yes, Lindholm and Gauthier would be above him).
 
I forget who it was on TSN who said that the Leafs failed to address any of their three needs which they identified as:

1) Back-up goaltending
2) RHD
3) Toughness

Where I think I disagree is the idea that today was a good day to do any of those things. That said, I agree that these are things that the team should keep an eye towards as they enter a different phase of team building. I think the team is pretty good for small, speedy skilled forwards. They should start rolling the dice on some bigger guys in the hopes that they can develop into guys who can contribute offensively and put pressure on the defense. Ditto they should invest some higher picks in goaltending.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Frank E said:
Yeah, I can't agree with that. 

I think a guy like Simmonds that plays a physical game could really help on Matthews' wing, especially in a Boston series.

If this was two year ago I'd absolutely agree. He's a shadow of his former self these days. And if he was playing on Matthews wing he'd be holding him back.

Simmonds has 15 5-on-5 points this season, a P/60 of 1.11.

On the Leafs that would put him tied for 9th among forwards (with Connor Brown) in points, and dead last in points per 60 (yes, Lindholm and Gauthier would be above him).

...Oh.
 
Nik the Trik said:
I forget who it was on TSN who said that the Leafs failed to address any of their three needs which they identified as:

1) Back-up goaltending
2) RHD
3) Toughness

Where I think I disagree is the idea that today was a good day to do any of those things. That said, I agree that these are things that the team should keep an eye towards as they enter a different phase of team building. I think the team is pretty good for small, speedy skilled forwards. They should start rolling the dice on some bigger guys in the hopes that they can develop into guys who can contribute offensively and put pressure on the defense. Ditto they should invest some higher picks in goaltending.

Silly to restrict the assessment solely to the day they devoted countless resources to making an overblown event, thus omitting the Muzzin trade as part of the equation.
 
herman said:
Silly to restrict the assessment solely to the day they devoted countless resources to making an overblown event, thus omitting the Muzzin trade as part of the equation.

I think it was an assessment of the team post-Muzzin so I'm not sure why you'd take that into the equation. All three things are still areas of need with Muzzin on the team.
 
I guess I agree with doing nothing at the deadline.  Getting Muzzin was already a pretty big splash.  And I quite like the minor trade they made today for Petan.  We'll see what happens.  Hopefully we don't have to play Boston.  I think we have a shot at taking down Tampa Bay and we could easily beat Montreal.  Even against Boston there is a decent chance we could beat them.  I just think the book might be out on the Leafs.  Teams are starting to wear them down physically and beat them.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top