• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick at: couchmanrick@gmail.com

Mammoth vs. Leafs - Oct. 13th, 9:00pm - TSN4

Bummer.

But they didn't deserve a point TBH.

Bright spots: Matthews, the PK, the overall ability to hang in and come back.
Dimmer spots: 41, 95, 44
 
Feels like we're back the early "core 4" era where the team is almost never out of a game, and the games are exciting to watch again.
 
Fun game to watch. Thought we might get overtime. Matthews and Nylander look good. Team is still really disjointed in the d zone. They have no idea how to break a forecheck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YYZ
Man that 5th goal against was killer. Knew that was going to end up being the difference.

Shot attempts with the top line on the ice were 13-1 Leafs. Roslovic should have had a pair, Marchenko was flying through the neutral zone with the puck, and Matthews had that vintage "I want the puck, I get the puck" feel to his game again.

On the flip side the 3rd line kinda got owned, going 0-12 in shot attempts. Sissons looked much better in his shifts on the 4th line while McKenna made up for his rough first two periods with a goal and looking more dangerous in the 3rd.
 
It's encouraging that they didn't just roll over and quit.

It's just not sustainable to need to score six goals to win a game.
 
It was a game we should have won, Stolarz let in some softies again and we couldn't catch up, on the plus side we do look better than last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YYZ
They have no idea how to break a forecheck.
I think they know how but often can't because of the speed differential the forecheckers are coming in with. Utah doesn't have the star power at the same luminosities as the Leafs top 6, but they have tremendous forward depth of speed and length and they did a good job forcing breakdowns.

What I see from good teams that break out well is that their forwards are in position to soft-interfere with forechecks to soak off a couple ticks of speed, giving their defenders an extra moment to make a good decision.

Their sort outs on zone entries is a bit of a mess as the D tend to sag back well below the dots and the Fs aren't picking up trailers fast enough because of that additional distance.
Goalies need to have these sort of straight on looks though.

Of course the one time Rielly feels brave enough to step up, he gets turnstiled immediately (really nice play by But that Stolarz should've been more focused on).
 
Last edited:
It felt like when Stolarz was making saves last night that he was still pretty lucky on a few of them. He made the one really nice cross crease save in the 2nd period but his 5 hole was wide open. He was leaving a lot of empty space which for a massive goalie is just not great.

The defence is definitely a problem with/without Tanev. They do move the puck up the ice but man there are a lot of fumbles where they can't make basic passes. I don't love that Raddysh is taking after Rielly and doing the flop on the ice defensive move.

Another solid game from Matthews. The 4th line I thought had some really solid shifts where they hemmed Utah in the defensive zone but at the same time the bottom six seems to be really quiet most nights. I know the 3rd line has had good games too but it just feels like there is very little chance that the bottom 6 is going to score goals.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,985
Messages
407,260
Members
817
Latest member
AndyC
Back
Top