Al14
New member
Chris said:CarltonTheBear said:Frank E said:So, speaking of the draft...it's obviously a long shot, but what if the Leafs get McDavid?
How does that affect the rebuild? He's likely to start with the team, and therefore beginning his ELC immediately. I would think that this fast forwards the rebuild somewhat over, say, drafting Strome.
To me the biggest thing that changes is Kessel. If we get McDavid then Phil isn't going anywhere. I'd still be looking at stripping away parts like Bozak and, well, Bozak, and the idea behind being patient with our non-McDavid prospects would still be the same. But it definitely fast-forwards our rebuild quite a bit, enough so that Phil would still be a very valuable contributor to the team when we're ready to compete.
I'm not sure that "fast forwarding" the rebuild is the best idea. We want to do this right, which means develop a young group of players together over a period of years. We have a few exciting prospects but not nearly enough...so that probably means a couple of years of finishing near the bottom and getting high draft picks. Worst thing would be for McDavid and Kessel to click and score enough to mess up that plan.
If we win the lottery, ideally I'd like to see Kessel traded for another decent first rounder this year (+ whatever) if we can get it.
Of course, if Shanahan et al were to decide to keep Phil, I'd think they have a good reason for that decision. And they should have much more information available than we do as fans, so I'd support that. But I'm not convinced it wouldn't lead to another half-hearted rebuild that would leave us asking "why didn't we tear it all down" again in 5 years.
Phil is a BIG part of the core of players that have failed to get the job done. Keeping him would be a big mistake at this point. By the time we build a new core of players around him, he may be in serious decline.
I think we should let Phil go elsewhere now, in his prime, to see if he can have better success with a new core.