Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullfrog said:Fantastic trade. I was quite confident that Polak would get more than just a single 2nd round pick.
Glad Torres isn't coming over to the Marlies.
Really? He's not a horrible hockey player just a bit on a nut. Given the projection of the Leafs for the rest of the year he might as well stay where he is. However, if it came to down to pulling a potential Leaf from the Marlies I would rather have Torres play for the Leafs and leave the prospect on the Marlies to hopefully experience a deep AHL playoff run.Dappleganger said:Bullfrog said:Fantastic trade. I was quite confident that Polak would get more than just a single 2nd round pick.
Glad Torres isn't coming over to the Marlies.
I would take Torres on the Leafs.
Nik the Trik said:herman said:If we keep pumping the tires on how Dubas traded down to stretch one 1st Rder into so many high potential magic beans, do you think we could probably package some spare picks to another 'rebuilding' team for a top 50 pick.
These multiple future picks would make nice pot sweeteners to push another team to concede their 1st round pick too.
Maybe. But the way teams did that was a result of having a bunch of spare 2nds and 3rds. Teams were able to trade up 5 or 6 spots by virtue of including late 2nds/early 3rds. Those are exactly the kinds of picks the Leafs don't really have right now.
LittleHockeyFan said:Raffi effin' Torres?!
Nik the Trik said:CarltonTheBear said:That's fair. I guess the thing is, could the Leafs have traded Polak for a 2nd rounder this year? Yeah, I think they definitely could have. Could they have traded Spaling in a separate deal to even kind of make up the gap in value between the two trades separately and this one? Not a chance.
See, I look at this trade slightly differently. I think this trade maybe says that A) Spaling had some sort of 5th/6th round value and B) Polak's value was maybe a bit higher than we thought. Not 1st round value but maybe 2nd and a 4th or 2nd and a 5th.
Bill_Berg said:Can't they use the 2017 and 2018 picks for that?
CarltonTheBear said:Lines at practice:
Grabner-Kadri-Leipsic
Greening-Arcobello-Parenteau
Winnik-Holland-Boyes
Leivo-Froese-Clune
Komarov
Marincin-Rielly
Gardiner-Corrado
Loov-Percy
Cowen
I'm actually pretty curious to see how that top-4 fares. Marincin's shown a consistent ability to limit shot attempts against, something that Rielly has struggled with. Obviously he hasn't done it against top opposition yet though. And Corrado still possibly has some untapped potential. He's probably best suited for a bottom-6 role but if he plays well with Gardiner then who knows.
CarltonTheBear said:Lines at practice:
Grabner-Kadri-Leipsic
Greening-Arcobello-Parenteau
Winnik-Holland-Boyes
Leivo-Froese-Clune
Komarov
Marincin-Rielly
Gardiner-Corrado
Loov-Percy
Cowen
Nice to see Leipsic getting a shot at the top-line. Would have swapped Winnik and Leivo but not entirely surprising to see it that way.
I'm actually pretty curious to see how that top-4 fares. Marincin's shown a consistent ability to limit shot attempts against, something that Rielly has struggled with. Obviously he hasn't done it against top opposition yet though. And Corrado still possibly has some untapped potential. He's probably best suited for a bottom pair role but if he plays well with Gardiner then who knows.
Nik the Trik said:Bill_Berg said:Can't they use the 2017 and 2018 picks for that?
They can, sure. It's not necessarily great in terms of value though. Ottawa and San Jose's 2nd rounders in 2017 could be anywhere in the draft order so by including them you could be in a situation where, say, you're trading a #32 and what ends up as the #37 pick for the #27, something I think probably seems like bad value.
CarltonTheBear said:Lines at practice:
Grabner-Kadri-Leipsic
Greening-Arcobello-Parenteau
Winnik-Holland-Boyes
Leivo-Froese-Clune
Komarov
Marincin-Rielly
Gardiner-Corrado
Loov-Percy
Cowen
Nice to see Leipsic getting a shot at the top-line. Would have swapped Winnik and Leivo but not entirely surprising to see it that way.
I'm actually pretty curious to see how that top-4 fares. Marincin's shown a consistent ability to limit shot attempts against, something that Rielly has struggled with. Obviously he hasn't done it against top opposition yet though. And Corrado still possibly has some untapped potential. He's probably best suited for a bottom pair role but if he plays well with Gardiner then who knows.
cabber24 said:Really? He's not a horrible hockey player just a bit on a nut. Given the projection of the Leafs for the rest of the year he might as well stay where he is. However, if it came to down to pulling a potential Leaf from the Marlies I would rather have Torres play for the Leafs and leave the prospect on the Marlies to hopefully experience a deep AHL playoff run.Dappleganger said:Bullfrog said:Fantastic trade. I was quite confident that Polak would get more than just a single 2nd round pick.
Glad Torres isn't coming over to the Marlies.
I would take Torres on the Leafs.
Maybe they should start airing Marlie games instead of Leaf games. The Marlie games are more relevant.
Patrick said:I think there's a decent case to be made that Polak as a rental fetched more than Phaneuf.