Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They didn?t gain enough speed through the neutral zone and actively slowed down instead of driving the net off the rush. On one play in the second period, Marner held the puck along the wall, and Tavares streaked through the middle of the ice with a chance for an odd-man rush. Instead of Marner racing down the ice with speed to put the Bruins on their heels, he slowed up and tried to saucer a puck past Matt Grzelcyk, who easily batted the puck down and moved it back up ice.
herman said:https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2024/04/21/game-in-10-maple-leafs-bruins-game-1/
They didn?t gain enough speed through the neutral zone and actively slowed down instead of driving the net off the rush. On one play in the second period, Marner held the puck along the wall, and Tavares streaked through the middle of the ice with a chance for an odd-man rush. Instead of Marner racing down the ice with speed to put the Bruins on their heels, he slowed up and tried to saucer a puck past Matt Grzelcyk, who easily batted the puck down and moved it back up ice.
Marner has time to rectify this (even though I was done with him like 2 years ago). Want to make 11+? Drive a line in the playoffs without Matthews carrying.
I think the staff used Jarnkrok because he's a right shot like Willy. Using Domi or Bert and your only right shot threat us Marner.Peter D. said:The PP looks dynamic when Nylander is pencilled in. Swap him out for Jarnkrok and it looks run-of-the-mill. What an awful option and decision. Park Bertuzzi's ass in front of the net instead.
Guilt Trip said:I think the staff used Jarnkrok because he's a right shot like Willy. Using Domi or Bert and your only right shot threat us Marner.
I'd still like to see Bert in front as well. JT is great for the tips but he doesn't create the chaos Bert does. Have JT in the high slot or below the goal line guy maybe.
Zee said:If Leafs don't get it done again, this core is pretty much screwed. They all have NMCs, Marner won't want to waive it so they risk re-signing him to another ridiculous contract or lose him for nothing. Back in 2016 this was supposed to be the beginning of dominance for the Leafs as the young stars grew and matured and instead they still look like shell shocked rookies when the games get tough.
Again they can still turn this around but if they don't, it's game over for this core. The time for excuses is over.
I completely agree with you. The PP actually worked best when Bert was on it and JT wasn't. They also had Liljegren on the point and he will shoot it. With Willy out I would even try Robertson out there in the high slot like Reinhart because of his shot. Let's see if they make adjustments because like all teams they're cheating to Matthews.Peter D. said:Guilt Trip said:I think the staff used Jarnkrok because he's a right shot like Willy. Using Domi or Bert and your only right shot threat us Marner.
I'd still like to see Bert in front as well. JT is great for the tips but he doesn't create the chaos Bert does. Have JT in the high slot or below the goal line guy maybe.
While I agree his right shot is likely why he is used, he looks lost and out of place out there. The Bruins know they are telegraphing the PP through Matthews, and they were cheating as such. Putting Bertuzzi in front not only screens Swayman, but it could open a few more possibilities like a Marner shot/pass or trying to get Rielly to fluff one through.
The PP is too predictable. With the talent at its disposal, I expect Oilers-like success.
You don't let players like Marner walk. If the plan isn't to re-sign him, you find a way to trade him. Like you mentioned though, let's see how it goes here.Chris said:Zee said:If Leafs don't get it done again, this core is pretty much screwed. They all have NMCs, Marner won't want to waive it so they risk re-signing him to another ridiculous contract or lose him for nothing. Back in 2016 this was supposed to be the beginning of dominance for the Leafs as the young stars grew and matured and instead they still look like shell shocked rookies when the games get tough.
Again they can still turn this around but if they don't, it's game over for this core. The time for excuses is over.
If Marner doesn't pick up his game a lot, I'd be OK with letting him walk. He and JT coming off the books would open up a TON of money that could be used to improve the team where it is really needed. If you figure that young players like Knies, Robertson, eventually Cowan and Minten (maybe include McMann though he isn't so young really) continue to get better that's a decent set of fowards to go along with Matthews and Nylander. What is really needed is defense and goaltending.
Of course, this could all be premature as there are at least 3 games left to play. But last night certainly didn't do much to suggest this group is really evolving in a positive direction.
Guilt Trip said:You don't let players like Marner walk. If the plan isn't to re-sign him, you find a way to trade him. Like you mentioned though, let's see how it goes here.Chris said:Zee said:If Leafs don't get it done again, this core is pretty much screwed. They all have NMCs, Marner won't want to waive it so they risk re-signing him to another ridiculous contract or lose him for nothing. Back in 2016 this was supposed to be the beginning of dominance for the Leafs as the young stars grew and matured and instead they still look like shell shocked rookies when the games get tough.
Again they can still turn this around but if they don't, it's game over for this core. The time for excuses is over.
If Marner doesn't pick up his game a lot, I'd be OK with letting him walk. He and JT coming off the books would open up a TON of money that could be used to improve the team where it is really needed. If you figure that young players like Knies, Robertson, eventually Cowan and Minten (maybe include McMann though he isn't so young really) continue to get better that's a decent set of fowards to go along with Matthews and Nylander. What is really needed is defense and goaltending.
Of course, this could all be premature as there are at least 3 games left to play. But last night certainly didn't do much to suggest this group is really evolving in a positive direction.
Zee said:Guilt Trip said:You don't let players like Marner walk. If the plan isn't to re-sign him, you find a way to trade him. Like you mentioned though, let's see how it goes here.Chris said:Zee said:If Leafs don't get it done again, this core is pretty much screwed. They all have NMCs, Marner won't want to waive it so they risk re-signing him to another ridiculous contract or lose him for nothing. Back in 2016 this was supposed to be the beginning of dominance for the Leafs as the young stars grew and matured and instead they still look like shell shocked rookies when the games get tough.
Again they can still turn this around but if they don't, it's game over for this core. The time for excuses is over.
If Marner doesn't pick up his game a lot, I'd be OK with letting him walk. He and JT coming off the books would open up a TON of money that could be used to improve the team where it is really needed. If you figure that young players like Knies, Robertson, eventually Cowan and Minten (maybe include McMann though he isn't so young really) continue to get better that's a decent set of fowards to go along with Matthews and Nylander. What is really needed is defense and goaltending.
Of course, this could all be premature as there are at least 3 games left to play. But last night certainly didn't do much to suggest this group is really evolving in a positive direction.
Way ahead of ourselves right now but it's not just 1 game here, this is 7-8 years of frustration watching the same players do the same things when it counts most. I agree if it comes down to it you want to trade Marner but given that he holds the cards with the NMC, it might be a really difficult trade to make
Thats not true. Tavares and Matthews don't do the glove in the face or fight but neither has an issue going to the dirty areas.azzurri63 said:Core 4 have not one ounce of toughness in them and never will.
Chris said:Obviously you try to trade him (Marner) but if you can't make it work for whatever reason, then yes it is OK to walk away.
If things go really badly this round (Leafs lose in 4 or 5) then probably the first thing is get rid of Keefe and see if someone else can push this group a little further. In that case you don't rush to re-sign Marner, let him play out next season and see where things are.
herman said:Going to start a rumour it?s a willy injury.
Per the sources, he is said to have woken up with an issue that needed attention Thursday morning and remained ?pretty stiff? when the series got underway more than 48 hours later. There?s no evidence Nylander even came to TD Garden on game day as he wasn?t spotted walking off either of the team buses in the morning or late afternoon.
Arn said:It?s a kind of addition by subtraction. Yes you don?t get assets in the form of players back, but you do get cap space so?