Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
crazyperfectdevil said:do we really need nash though? .like if they were giving him away ...sure ...but it still feels more like the leafs need a big center ....not a winger ..at least i think that's where their limited assets should be directed
crazyperfectdevil said:do we really need nash though? .like if they were giving him away ...sure ...but it still feels more like the leafs need a big center ....not a winger ..at least i think that's where their limited assets should be directed
RedLeaf said:crazyperfectdevil said:do we really need nash though? .like if they were giving him away ...sure ...but it still feels more like the leafs need a big center ....not a winger ..at least i think that's where their limited assets should be directed
I dunno. How good would a line of Nash-Grabbo-Kulemin look? Plus Bozak's starting to look really good on that top line.
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:The talk of re-signing Grabovski and others seems to rely on us cutting some of the bloated contracts from our team, these are the same contracts people are talking of shifting to make room for Nash.
So if we get Nash does that mean we probably wont re-sign Grabbo, cause that 7.8 million coming back sure makes it seem that way.
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:See I'd agree Red, but he's also said he likes this group quite a lot and wants to tinker as oppose to blowing it up, that much turnover is a pretty drastic change.
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:Lombardi, Connolly, Armstrong, Komisarek, MacArthur, Schenn.
Some or all of the above, not to mention other young assets that might go in a trade, would have to be moved on to accommodate acquiring Nash and re-signing Grabo and Kulemin.
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:Lombardi, Connolly, Armstrong, Komisarek, MacArthur, Schenn.
Some or all of the above, not to mention other young assets that might go in a trade, would have to be moved on to accommodate acquiring Nash and re-signing Grabo and Kulemin.
I don't think they are considered long term pieces and I'm not really picking a bone with you, what I'm saying is that Burke has spoken about liking this group and only tinkering as oppose to major surgery.RedLeaf said:WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:Lombardi, Connolly, Armstrong, Komisarek, MacArthur, Schenn.
Some or all of the above, not to mention other young assets that might go in a trade, would have to be moved on to accommodate acquiring Nash and re-signing Grabo and Kulemin.
I never mentioned Armstrong or Komi's name in my scenario. As far as the rest, except Schenn, how many of those players were really considered long term pieces?
soc7 said:At least we are not outbidding 29 other teams right now. The short list helps us a bit and i think our only real competition is LA.
bustaheims said:soc7 said:At least we are not outbidding 29 other teams right now. The short list helps us a bit and i think our only real competition is LA.
The problem is still that any offer will have to be one that actually convinces Columbus to move Nash, which, despite him being "available," is not something they have any reason to feel pressure to get done any time soon.
Newbury said:If we were getting Nash, I'd hope CBJ takes back Connolly, which is probably unlikely.