Guilt Trip said:No..Willy isn't good a centre. Foligno has played there before. Willy can roam enough all over the ice but Foligno is probably better defensively. Third line should be a lot better and be very fast. Nash doesn't belong there. He's a 4th liner/PKer especially with Tavares out and his lack of offence.Significantly Insignificant said:Dappleganger said:CarltonTheBear said:https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1395772671384817668
Hmm. I saw people suggesting Foligno might go to C but I really didn't expect it.
I almost would have tried Brooks there. He's a hard worker. Maybe he finds a little chemistry with Foligno and Nylander.
Or just move Nylander to center, and have Foligno on his wing. Nylander can roam and Nick can hold down the fort.
Agree. The only other change to consider might be putting Hyman on line 3 to spread out the wealth a bit, since he was able to drive that line pretty well during the regular season. What was the combo that worked so well for a while? Was it Hyman/Mikheyev/Engvall? Or was Kerfoot there? Of course that leaves a spot open on line 1 and with JT out, maybe that dilutes the top lines too much.
Nash really did look like a 4th liner last night, is that what he is or is it partly the fact he hasn't played in a long time? I honestly don't remember him from the recent playoff series against the Leafs.