• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Sens vs Habs

Derk said:
What a difference an opponent makes. This could be the Leafs moving on while Ottawa falls to Boston.

Yup, that loss in the very last game of the regular season against Montreal ruined everything. I guess the Leafs have to do everything the hard way.
 
Congrats to the Sens...they're a tricky team to play against with Anderson and Karlsson back.  Arguably the best defenceman and goalie in the league right now.

Despite 2 blowouts, this series was closer than the 4-1 result, but it doesn't matter, the Habs were toast with all their injuries plus they just don't seem like a team built for the playoffs.

Ottawa is a confident group right now and are going to be nice and rested for whoever they get in round 2.  Looks like they're this years sleeper.
 
My biggest foot stomping, pillow punching moment of the year is now officially that last reg. season game vs. the Habs.

Man oh man what might have been.
 
Rumours are that Spezza will be back for round 2, although the Sens are keeping expectations low.

There are a number of teams that I think are still on another level even when the Sens are at their best. But with Spezza, Karlsson and Anderson, we have 3 guys that can single handedly win games for them.

Hopefully the rest will help Karlsson. Despite having 6 points in 5 games, he's still a shadow of who he was pre-injury.
 
Sucker Punch said:
Rumours are that Spezza will be back for round 2, although the Sens are keeping expectations low.

There are a number of teams that I think are still on another level even when the Sens are at their best. But with Spezza, Karlsson and Anderson, we have 3 guys that can single handedly win games for them.

Hopefully the rest will help Karlsson. Despite having 6 points in 5 games, he's still a shadow of who he was pre-injury.

Dammit, I'd really like to cheer for them if they weren't, you know, Ottawa.
 
Sucker Punch said:
Hopefully the rest will help Karlsson. Despite having 6 points in 5 games, he's still a shadow of who he was pre-injury.

It will help him a little, but I wouldn't expect him to be really close to where he was at pre-injury until his achilles has really been given a good chunk of time to heal and strengthen without being pushed.
 
Sucker Punch said:
Rumours are that Spezza will be back for round 2, although the Sens are keeping expectations low.

There are a number of teams that I think are still on another level even when the Sens are at their best. But with Spezza, Karlsson and Anderson, we have 3 guys that can single handedly win games for them.

Hopefully the rest will help Karlsson. Despite having 6 points in 5 games, he's still a shadow of who he was pre-injury.

This is the thing I find amazing about the Sens easily ousting the Habs.  The series wasn't even close, and you didn't have a healthy Karlsson OR Spezza.  The Habs can whine all they want about Eller, but Lars Eller is nowhere near what Spezza is when he's healthy.  Karlsson playing at 50% (or whatever his status) was still able to put up more points than Subban.  I think the Habs team overachieved large this season and they'll get back to reality next season.  They weren't a 2nd seed team by any stretch of the imagination.
 
This series wasn't even close???  Without Anderson or a better Price and Habs win this series in my opinion.  Game 1 Habs outshoot Ott 50-31.  Game 3 Habs have 2-0 lead until kicked in goal.  Even last game Anderson holds team in game early and Habs can't get a save to save their lives.
 
Zee said:
This is the thing I find amazing about the Sens easily ousting the Habs.  The series wasn't even close, and you didn't have a healthy Karlsson OR Spezza.  The Habs can whine all they want about Eller, but Lars Eller is nowhere near what Spezza is when he's healthy.  Karlsson playing at 50% (or whatever his status) was still able to put up more points than Subban.  I think the Habs team overachieved large this season and they'll get back to reality next season.  They weren't a 2nd seed team by any stretch of the imagination.

Did you actually watch the games?  They outplayed Ottawa badly game 1 where they got 50 shots, Anderson stole the game.  Same with game 4, they were winning 2-0 with 8 minutes to go.  Series could have easily been 3-1 Habs at that point.  The series was way closer than the result, just like the Leafs / Boston series.
 
Bates said:
This series wasn't even close???  Without Anderson or a better Price and Habs win this series in my opinion.  Game 1 Habs outshoot Ott 50-31.  Game 3 Habs have 2-0 lead until kicked in goal.  Even last game Anderson holds team in game early and Habs can't get a save to save their lives.

Sens outscored Habs 20-9.  Goalies are part of the team.  Habs fans weren't complaining when Halak stole 2 series for them a few years ago.  Anderson is far better than Price, but I'm saying a healthy Sens vs. a healthy Habs and the Sens win this no problem.  Like I mentioned, Karlsson not 100% and Spezza not even playing. 
 
Manson said:
Zee said:
This is the thing I find amazing about the Sens easily ousting the Habs.  The series wasn't even close, and you didn't have a healthy Karlsson OR Spezza.  The Habs can whine all they want about Eller, but Lars Eller is nowhere near what Spezza is when he's healthy.  Karlsson playing at 50% (or whatever his status) was still able to put up more points than Subban.  I think the Habs team overachieved large this season and they'll get back to reality next season.  They weren't a 2nd seed team by any stretch of the imagination.

Did you actually watch the games?  They outplayed Ottawa badly game 1 where they got 50 shots, Anderson stole the game.  Same with game 4, they were winning 2-0 with 8 minutes to go.  Series could have easily been 3-1 Habs at that point.  The series was way closer than the result, just like the Leafs / Boston series.

I watched every game.
 
It only matters who did play and not who didn't.  You stated this series wasn't even close and that is just not true.  A couple bouces either way and the Habs are in full control coming home with a 3-1 series lead. 
 
Bates said:
It only matters who did play and not who didn't.  You stated this series wasn't even close and that is just not true.  A couple bouces either way and the Habs are in full control coming home with a 3-1 series lead.

Bounces, shmounches, they only won game 2 rallying behind the Gyba/Eller incident.  I never felt the Sens were truly in danger of losing any of the other games even when down 2-0 in game 4.  Goaltending and overall team defense wins series and winning in 5 games isn't close.  Even the Leafs series isn't close if the Leafs don't win tonight.
 
So if a team loses 4 games and each of them are won 1-0 in OT to you that series isn't even close because it's 4 games straight???  All right then
 
Bates said:
So if a team loses 4 games and each of them are won 1-0 in OT to you that series isn't even close because it's 4 games straight???  All right then

This wasn't the case here was it?  There were two 6-1 games and another game where the Sens won by 2 goals.  Also, the Sens scored 11 third period goals to the Habs 0.  There was missing quality and finish on the Habs side and that made the series not close.
 
Bates said:
It only matters who did play and not who didn't.  You stated this series wasn't even close and that is just not true.  A couple bouces either way and the Habs are in full control coming home with a 3-1 series lead.

The only close game the Habs lost was the OT game. so maybe the series would be 3-2 for the Sens if the Habs got some bounces there. But the two 6-1 losses there was no chance. And the 4-2 loss was last goal with 6 mins to go - no empty netter - Habs had lots of shots from the outside to win the shot total but the Sens played pretty well.

I thought the Sens were handily the better team.
 
Zee said:
This wasn't the case here was it?

That wasn't the case here, but you said winning in 5 games isn't close and then further expanded to say the Leafs / Bruins series isn't close either should they lose in 5.  I don't know you could say the Leafs series isn't at least close.  They hit the post in OT, an inch from making the series 2-2, just as Montreal was 20 seconds away from making it 2-2.   

Obviously a series can be close regardless of the amount of games. 
 
cw said:
The only close game the Habs lost was the OT game. so maybe the series would be 3-2 for the Sens if the Habs got some bounces there. But the two 6-1 losses there was no chance. And the 4-2 loss was last goal with 6 mins to go - no empty netter - Habs had lots of shots from the outside to win the shot total but the Sens played pretty well.

I thought the Sens were handily the better team.

Okay, so a couple bounces and the series is 3-2?  That's not close?

Besides, Montreal outplayed Ottawa badly game 1...it came down to Anderson, he stole it.  They lost 2 games where they outplayed Ottawa.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top