Kin
New member
Andy007 said:TML fan said:I'm disappointed with Bautista's fielding.
But less disappointed with his game-tying home run, I would imagine.
Bautista's homerun put them up 1-0 in the first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Andy007 said:TML fan said:I'm disappointed with Bautista's fielding.
But less disappointed with his game-tying home run, I would imagine.
Heroic Shrimp said:Welcome back, Nolan Reimold.
Nik the Trik said:Andy007 said:TML fan said:I'm disappointed with Bautista's fielding.
But less disappointed with his game-tying home run, I would imagine.
Bautista's homerun put them up 1-0 in the first.
L K said:Heroic Shrimp said:Welcome back, Nolan Reimold.
I was very happy when they picked him up. His career numbers are not great but he has shown the ability to hit lefties at times. He's also a guy who seems to have more problems staying hot because of injuries rather than a lack of talent. As a 4th outfielder (or 5th with the way Gibbons is using Gose over him) because you know, significantly below average offense is better?
Nik the Trik said:I think Anthopolous deserves a lot of criticism for what happened yesterday(and his general inaction leading up to the deadline) but it's not for his decisions not to ship Sanchez or Stroman but rather for the general crumminess of the farm system/crummy returns for the Marlins/Dickey trades that have left the Jays largely unable to compete in that market.
L K said:Going into the offseason the Jays needed help up the middle in the infield, some bench depth, another late innings reliever and at least another #3 starter if not a #1 or #2. After the non-waiver deadline the Jays need some more help in the middle of the infield, some more bench depth, a late innings reliever and another starter. Job well done Alex.
Potvin29 said:L K said:Going into the offseason the Jays needed help up the middle in the infield, some bench depth, another late innings reliever and at least another #3 starter if not a #1 or #2. After the non-waiver deadline the Jays need some more help in the middle of the infield, some more bench depth, a late innings reliever and another starter. Job well done Alex.
Since Stroman was not on the opening day roster, does his addition not function as adding another starter without having to do so through trade?
Frank E said:Potvin29 said:L K said:Going into the offseason the Jays needed help up the middle in the infield, some bench depth, another late innings reliever and at least another #3 starter if not a #1 or #2. After the non-waiver deadline the Jays need some more help in the middle of the infield, some more bench depth, a late innings reliever and another starter. Job well done Alex.
Since Stroman was not on the opening day roster, does his addition not function as adding another starter without having to do so through trade?
My rookie opinion, but I'd agree, and I'd say the addition of Sanchez also fills in that reliever spot in the short term.
Still, I was disappointed that nothing got done, but I'm not convinced the deals were there to be had for the Jays.
Frank E said:Still, I was disappointed that nothing got done, but I'm not convinced the deals were there to be had for the Jays.
Potvin29 said:Same, and as previously mentioned that's probably due to past AA moves, but the Jays are also in a different position than the teams that made big moves. Those teams can sell hard because they're legit WS contenders, whereas the Jays would be doing so just trying to get into the playoffs. I think they probably feel that they can get in with the club as it stands more or less and if they do that it's a bit of a crapshoot after that.
A move like the Orioles made for a reliever would have been nice though.
Potvin29 said:Frank E said:Potvin29 said:L K said:Going into the offseason the Jays needed help up the middle in the infield, some bench depth, another late innings reliever and at least another #3 starter if not a #1 or #2. After the non-waiver deadline the Jays need some more help in the middle of the infield, some more bench depth, a late innings reliever and another starter. Job well done Alex.
Since Stroman was not on the opening day roster, does his addition not function as adding another starter without having to do so through trade?
My rookie opinion, but I'd agree, and I'd say the addition of Sanchez also fills in that reliever spot in the short term.
Still, I was disappointed that nothing got done, but I'm not convinced the deals were there to be had for the Jays.
Same, and as previously mentioned that's probably due to past AA moves, but the Jays are also in a different position than the teams that made big moves. Those teams can sell hard because they're legit WS contenders, whereas the Jays would be doing so just trying to get into the playoffs. I think they probably feel that they can get in with the club as it stands more or less and if they do that it's a bit of a crapshoot after that.
A move like the Orioles made for a reliever would have been nice though.
bustaheims said:Yup. Also, the window with the core group on the roster is pretty small, and I'm not sure the potential to win it all is really there with them. Sacrificing significant pieces of the futures to still be a long-shot at winning the WS now wouldn't be prudent.
Nik the Trik said:bustaheims said:Yup. Also, the window with the core group on the roster is pretty small, and I'm not sure the potential to win it all is really there with them. Sacrificing significant pieces of the futures to still be a long-shot at winning the WS now wouldn't be prudent.
But that's why I said that the criticism directed AA's way shouldn't be about the deals he didn't make yesterday, it's about putting the team in the posititon so that the only options he had yesterday involved dealing guys like Stroman and Sanchez.
Fact is out of the big trades he made only Buerhle has performed at a level they could legitimately be happy with and that's a huge factor in why they're not the contenders the A's or Tigers are.
hap_leaf said:Janssen should focus on closing games instead of giving backhanded compliments out to the other teams in order to stick it to AA.
I can't believe he would state to the media that other teams must value the opportunity to get to the playoffs more; congratulating the other teams that got "those guys'.
Andy007 said:hap_leaf said:Janssen should focus on closing games instead of giving backhanded compliments out to the other teams in order to stick it to AA.
I can't believe he would state to the media that other teams must value the opportunity to get to the playoffs more; congratulating the other teams that got "those guys'.
Janssen is 18 for 20 in closing out games so I think he's fairly focused in that regard.
Quite frankly I like hearing honest opinions. These guys aren't saying this to get back at anyone; it's an honest belief from players on a team that hasn't even been remotely close to the playoffs in over 20 years.
Potvin29 said:Andy007 said:hap_leaf said:Janssen should focus on closing games instead of giving backhanded compliments out to the other teams in order to stick it to AA.
I can't believe he would state to the media that other teams must value the opportunity to get to the playoffs more; congratulating the other teams that got "those guys'.
Janssen is 18 for 20 in closing out games so I think he's fairly focused in that regard.
Quite frankly I like hearing honest opinions. These guys aren't saying this to get back at anyone; it's an honest belief from players on a team that hasn't even been remotely close to the playoffs in over 20 years.
I'd say 2000 was remotely close!
Andy007 said:Potvin29 said:Andy007 said:hap_leaf said:Janssen should focus on closing games instead of giving backhanded compliments out to the other teams in order to stick it to AA.
I can't believe he would state to the media that other teams must value the opportunity to get to the playoffs more; congratulating the other teams that got "those guys'.
Janssen is 18 for 20 in closing out games so I think he's fairly focused in that regard.
Quite frankly I like hearing honest opinions. These guys aren't saying this to get back at anyone; it's an honest belief from players on a team that hasn't even been remotely close to the playoffs in over 20 years.
I'd say 2000 was remotely close!
14 years then
Was 2000 the Tim Johnson year? The one that went on a huge winning streak the last month or so? Sean Green was the man!