Kin
Active member
herman said:That?s my daily inner turmoil: trying to stand out or fit in
Just remember that the real Supreme Intelligence is the friends we make along the way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
herman said:That?s my daily inner turmoil: trying to stand out or fit in
Arn said:Wasn't sure if this fell under Movie, TV or Music thread as it's on Netflix but it's 90 minutes long soooo
The Dirt
The biopic of Motley Crue in the 1980s and 1990s. If you think of all the most hedonistic heavy metal band stories you heard from back then, they're probably in this movie. It's absolutely mad from the opening scene with a "cameo"* from Ozzy Osbourne that is particularly memorable
But they also touch on some pretty weighty subjects such as Heroin addiction.
It's done in a light hearted way, and more of a celebration of the lifestyle, and it probably won't go down too well with the Me Too movement. But I enjoyed it and as a representation of the times I suspect it's pretty accurate...
*Not the actual Ozzy, alas
Wait. What if your sensibilities mean you don't get offended easily? I mean I'm sure some people were offended by the movie, so wouldn't that make it's point with other viewers?Nik the Trik said:I saw it and to the movie's credit they don't spend much time trying to lionize the band or their music(Hair Metal isn't my thing but I'm not even sure where they rank in that genre's firmament). In fact, there's really not a lot of music in the movie at all. I thought the performances were pretty good with whatshisname from Game of Thrones being particularly good as their guitarist.
Where I think the movie was a bit of a let down was with the supposed debauchery. I'm not sure it was as ridiculous as it was presented as. Outside of the scene with Ozzy, I'm not sure that what they got up to amounted to much more than trashing hotel rooms, downing copious amounts of drugs/alcohol and having sex with groupies. While I'm sure that was loads of fun it also sort of reads as pretty standard for rock bands. It's not, for instance, Led Zeppelin and the shark.
I suppose a point could be made about them kind of glossing over the fact that their drummer has a history of smacking around the women in his life, which feels like a bigger thing than just some #MeToo inspired political correctness, but if anything my main beef with the movie is that I wasn't particularly offended by anything which sort of raises the question of what the point of the movie is.
Gender Bender said:Wait. What if your sensibilities mean you don't get offended easily? I mean I'm sure some people were offended by the movie, so wouldn't that make it's point with other viewers?
Just saw it, Joaquin is Oscar bound..scary stuffArn said:Anyone seen Joker yet?
I thought Joaquin Phoenix was sensational. Thought it would be hard to match Heath ledger's interpretation and while very different, this is very close to equal.
As for the movie I thought it was fantastic, mainly because of the point I made above, but at the same time I can see why people would have many issues with it...
Some say that Hitchcock?s pictures had a sameness to them, and perhaps that?s true ? Hitchcock himself wondered about it. But the sameness of today?s franchise pictures is something else again. Many of the elements that define cinema as I know it are there in Marvel pictures. What?s not there is revelation, mystery or genuine emotional danger. Nothing is at risk. The pictures are made to satisfy a specific set of demands, and they are designed as variations on a finite number of themes.
They are sequels in name but they are remakes in spirit, and everything in them is officially sanctioned because it can?t really be any other way. That?s the nature of modern film franchises: market-researched, audience-tested, vetted, modified, revetted and remodified until they?re ready for consumption.
Nik Bethune said:I recently got a chance to see Booksmart and while I'm not the first person to say this, I definitely think it's one of the better movies of the year. It's reductive to just call it a gender swapped Superbad but that's the jist of it and it's really, really funny.
herman said:Did you see Blockers? Criminally poor marketing, but I don't remember the last time I laughed this much.
Nik Bethune said:herman said:Did you see Blockers? Criminally poor marketing, but I don't remember the last time I laughed this much.
I haven't and, like you say, I didn't think much of it based on what I saw of the trailers but I'll give it a try between your recommendation and a surprisingly good RT score.
L K said:Nik Bethune said:herman said:Did you see Blockers? Criminally poor marketing, but I don't remember the last time I laughed this much.
I haven't and, like you say, I didn't think much of it based on what I saw of the trailers but I'll give it a try between your recommendation and a surprisingly good RT score.
John Cena is surprisingly good.