Kin
New member
herman said:I kind of get that might be a misconception from some players (all that school they skip), but from management?
Eh, they're just ex-players for the most part.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
herman said:I kind of get that might be a misconception from some players (all that school they skip), but from management?
Nik the Trik said:herman said:I kind of get that might be a misconception from some players (all that school they skip), but from management?
Eh, they're just ex-players for the most part.
herman said:Nik the Trik said:herman said:I kind of get that might be a misconception from some players (all that school they skip), but from management?
Eh, they're just ex-players for the most part.
The trick is getting a coach who not only understands the numbers/reasons, but who also knows how to apply that info into actionable tactics.
Frank E said:herman said:The trick is getting a coach who not only understands the numbers/reasons, but who also knows how to apply that info into actionable tactics.
I think you might be missing Blashill's point a little bit.
The idea is to coach to put the players in better shooting positions, and more often, in order to get the scoring chances, rather than just simply shooting the puck more.
herman said:Frank E said:herman said:The trick is getting a coach who not only understands the numbers/reasons, but who also knows how to apply that info into actionable tactics.
I think you might be missing Blashill's point a little bit.
The idea is to coach to put the players in better shooting positions, and more often, in order to get the scoring chances, rather than just simply shooting the puck more.
I interpreted what you just said here as an elaboration on what I said in the quote. I don't think I was advocating for merely shooting the puck more.
More along the lines of controlled exits/entries (hold and look), even though that goes against the traditional line of risk averse thinking (dump and chase, off the glass and out).
Frank E said:Agreed...but I'd go even further and say that cycling along the boards is part of wearing down the defense to create space for better shot opportunities. I think that's part of the "heavier game" that Babcock refers to.
CarltonTheBear said:The Rangers currently have 12 (TWELVE) forwards scoring at least .59 points per game on the season. A .59 PPG translates to 48 points in 82 games.
herman said:CarltonTheBear said:The Rangers currently have 12 (TWELVE) forwards scoring at least .59 points per game on the season. A .59 PPG translates to 48 points in 82 games.
They're the team that's rolling 4 skill lines, right?
CarltonTheBear said:herman said:CarltonTheBear said:The Rangers currently have 12 (TWELVE) forwards scoring at least .59 points per game on the season. A .59 PPG translates to 48 points in 82 games.
They're the team that's rolling 4 skill lines, right?
Yeah, they've had some minor injuries hit a few forwards here and there, but they've often gone with:
Kreider-Zibanejad-Zuccarello
Vesey-Stepan-Nash
Grabner-Hayes-Miller
Buchnevich-Pirri-Fast
herman said:I haven't really watched their games. Are they overly reliant on Lundqvist like Montreal is with Price?
CarltonTheBear said:It's been 17 days since Edmonton's version of the "Where are the critics of Nonis' off-season moves now?" article hit. Since then they've won in regulation once and are currently on a 5-game losing streak. Wonderful.
wnc096 said:why is that wonderful?
wnc096 said:CarltonTheBear said:It's been 17 days since Edmonton's version of the "Where are the critics of Nonis' off-season moves now?" article hit. Since then they've won in regulation once and are currently on a 5-game losing streak. Wonderful.
why is that wonderful?
Nik the Trik said:wnc096 said:why is that wonderful?
Because the Oilers are garbage and we should be rooting for their failure.